BroadwayRox3588 said: "My point is that, in spring 2020, one thing that was very clearly articulated, in no uncertain terms, was that mitigation measures were temporary. Like I said, this was stated with certainty by virtually every credible scientist. "This will end," they said. "This is not forever," they said. "We will go back to normal," they said.
Fast forward two years, and it's not feeling so temporary anymore. And, as has been pointed out, there are many on these boards who seem to want it to be permanent.
Maybe "moving the goalposts" was the wrong terminology. But I know plenty of people who are feeling more than a little discouraged at the prolonged, and perpetually extended emphasis on these supposedly "temporary" measures. Discouraged, and dare I say, a bit punked."
I'm not sure anyone said anything with certanty in 2020 because that's not a word scientists use. A credible scientist would never say more than that, based on observed facts, the outcome would be a certain way. But, clearly, no one in 2020 knew we were going to have Delta, or Omicron. If anything, a scientist would have assumed (as they did) that people would be rational meaning they would stay home, wear masks, mitigate, etc., yet half the country did not. And of course it was also explained that the risk of doing what half the country did was that the virus would be able to mutate into new variants, which is exactly what happened. So if scientists expressed what seemed like certainty to you, they were making assumptions, first and foremost, that the people of this world (and especially this country) were not as stupid as they turned out to be. If people feel punked, they should direct their attention to the idiots. Omicron did not fill hospitals in NY to capacity. We did not have dead people in refrigerator trucks. Yes we had terrible stuff happening but nothing like in, e.g., Houston. If we were an island nation with regulated borders, we would not be wearing masks in theatres right now.