Sad to hear. In Phildelphia,we haven"t had a full dedicated theater critic for years. The Inquirer relies on stringers or wire services to cover shows,if covered at all.
Isn’t he the one who never bothered to move to DC, and has lived in NY the whole time he was the Post’s theater critic? The Post should have a full time theater critic, but it should be someone who actually lives here.
His reviews and ratings were always sought after by readers and professionals in the theatrical industry..., it's truly unfortunate that he has departed
bear88 said: "Marks is one of the more knowledgeable critics around and to his credit, he maintains infectious enthusiasm for the shows and performances he likes."
annang said: "Isn’t he the one who never bothered to move to DC, and has lived in NY the whole time he was the Post’s theater critic? The Post should have a full time theater critic, but it should be someone who actually lives here."
If it was true and I don’t know if it is, it would make sense as New York is the epicentre for the countries theatre scene, Washington is very quiet in comparison with very limited theatre, he could easily travel down to Washington and get a Marriott room for shows there.
Because he is a theatre critic and the publication title contains Washington doesn’t mean he has to live there.
Nothing wrong with a critic splitting time between New York and the region that they cover, especially when writing for a national publication. Charles McNulty and Chris Jones both review New York shows, in addition to ones in the cities that bear their paper's name. Marks obviously has major affection for the DC theatre scene.
Yep. He lived in DC for years. When his daughter went to college and his wife took a job in New York, they moved here. As he put it, he just took the Acela the other direction.