I thought it worked seamlessly in 110 IN THE SHADE.
If people are able to suspend disbelief that the people up on stage are breaking into song and dance every few minutes, there's no reason why they can't look past the colors of the actors' skin and just see human beings, as a family, in a show like 110 IN THE SHADE where race isn't an issue in the story being told.
The line that Violet has about Native Americans being no more native than she is, is a line that is going to have to be changed, otherwise it's not going to make any sense. I'm surprised Letts would be willing to change the text of his Pulitzer prize winning script.
Another line that isn't going to work as well the way it is currently written is, "There's a Indian in my house!" It is going to draw notice to the fact that Violet is the only African-American in her house, and not make as much sense.
Those two lines do really help draw the character of Violet, and get some of the biggest laughs in the play. It should be interesting to see how they will be handled.
I don't, however, think that believability of a family with different skin colors should be an issue in a play, unless it is specifically noted in the text that they are of the same skin color.
Violet's racist nature is going to have to be changed somehow, though.
It should be interesting to see how it plays out.
"Winning a Tony this year is like winning Best Attendance in third grade: no one will care but the winner and their mom."
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
Updated On: 3/6/09 at 01:37 PM