>>
I do think he could handle it even if it's not "black" enough for him as someone so sweetly statedIt's okay to use my name, dont worry. :)
Look, folks, all I'm saying is:
look at the work. Lee's films approach characters in a certain way, and Columbus's films approach situations in a certain way. Those are givens, sorry.
But the larger point here is, if I may:
this is just my opinion, and I happen to think it's a reasonably informed one, just as other folks here have their deeply felt and informed opinions about Broadway stars whom I only vaguely recognize. If you dont agree, that's fine, but let's make it slightly more informed than "well, poo on you!"
We're not all going to agree on everything, but to respond to a critique with "
Do me a favor, Sean Martin. Look into that crystal ball and tell me what the lotto numbers will be Wednesday night" is pretty much saying Matt hasn't a clue how to respond and chooses instead to be disrespectful because it's cute. And if indeed that is the way these boards work, then perhaps he's right and my time here will be a short one.
But whatever, folks. I still think Columbus is a lousy choice.
And I could be wrong.
What a concept, eh?
"That duck was a sexual toy, and it was on display!" -- an unknown Nashville town leader
Updated On: 7/5/04 at 04:26 PM