Excuse my ignorant, non-US perspective, and assuming Blackface means painting some cast members 'black' to appear..well black.. - how is this offensive?
^ Blackface was used in minstrelsy. White men would paint their faces black (and sometimes dress in drag) to "romanticize" plantation life. This is where many African-American stereotypes became popular. Although it was the most popular entertainment of its time (and in a way, the first truely "American" entertainment), minstrelsy and blackface are considered highly offensive today (even though it is often refrenced in pop culture and the cinema). Minstrelsy is also one of the most influential elements of the musical theater. If you want to learn more about blackface and minstrelsy (and its sexual implications) I recommend Eric Lott's Love and Theft.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=1919122
"I find it as a different Matter. when I did the show we didn't use yellow face make up. we used cake face make up."
WTF?
No was talking about actually painting your face yellow...
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/27/05
This thread reminds me of the particularly 'interestingly cast' version of 'West Side Story' I saw the other week. Even if one as to ignore the fact it had the most lily white Sharks (with a couple of token Asians actors), the truly worst thing was having having sit through all their hammed up Latino accent which I swear they could've only copied from a Speedy Gonzalez cartoon.
The OP didn't say there were no African Americans at the school - only not in the drama world. Announcing Ragtime and a call for African American kids to audition - along with perhaps playing some of the songs over the P.A. might expand those who might come out for the show. Doing Ragtime could be a wonderful opportunity to expand the drama world at this school. Instead of trying to find ways to cast non-African Americans in African American roles in a show striving to talk about racial tolerance ("Till We Reach That Day") - try to find ways to get more African Americans involved. If there are obvious choices for a Sara and a Coalhouse, they can help recruit others to the show.
ggersten, makes a great suggestion. Perhaps, before you actually go out and buy the rights to Ragtime you could have an informational meeting to see what sort of interest there is among the African-American population. If no one shows up you could scrap the idea without having spent any money.
But I don't think the OP is reading this thread anymore. I suspect he's taken his ball and gone home.
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/21/05
"Sorry, I misunderstood. I'm still bothered that a show which is obviously not appropriate for the student body is the popular choice amongst parents and faculty."
I don't find anything inappropriate in Ragtime that the student body can't handle.
"Excuse my ignorant, non-US perspective, and assuming Blackface means painting some cast members 'black' to appear..well black.. - how is this offensive?"
How is it NOT offensive? It is nothing more than playing stereotypes. There is absolutely no justification to ever appear on stage like that.
There is justification to appear in blackface, if that is part of the show. I saw an amazing production entitled I believe "Three Black and Three White Minstrels" in Berkeley, um, a few decades ago. Blackface was used and discussed as to its inappropriateness as part of the production. It was at the Julia Morgan Theatre and besides the "history" lesson was just a gripping night of theatre.
I don't find anything inappropriate in Ragtime that the student body can't handle.
Inappropriate in the sense that it's not a fitting show for the students available, not that the content was inappropriate. Although, I'm not sure how they intended to handle a white boy in blackface crying out the N-word.
But unless you're doing a musical about Al Jolson, why would blackface ever occur to someone as acceptable?
Too bad the producers of the Al Jolson musical in London stated they would not be using blackface at all because they didn't want to offend anybody.
Minstrelsy is an ugly part of our cultural history, but it was so pervasive and popular that even black entertainers such as Bert Williams performed in blackface. What's really sad is that some tremendous entertainers such as Al Jolson and Eddie Cantor are not better known to us because their blackface acts (show-horned into many of their films) stigmatized the films as a whole. It's tough to even get your hands on some of those films now, and it's a real shame, because they 2 were some of the greatest comedians of the last century.
Yeah I would go with another show.
My high school director really wanted to do the show. The school board wanted certain "language" changed to be more appropriate. He did not want to do that, because it would not have been how it was during that time... so new shows were picked.
"How is it NOT offensive? It is nothing more than playing stereotypes. There is absolutely no justification to ever appear on stage like that."
Well if it's done that way, and I guess at a high school level I guess that's what would happen.
I guess it would be hard not to see it as a joke, but still the premise of someone pretending to be black because there is no alternative doesn't seem offensive to me. So again for me (as people pointed out earlier) I see the offense just with the historical association..
I guess it would be hard not to see it as a joke, but still the premise of someone pretending to be black because there is no alternative doesn't seem offensive to me.
There IS an alternative: pick another show.
Broadway Legend Joined: 2/20/04
Doing RAGTIME with white actors wearing negro make-up makes as much sense as doing THE VAGINA MONOLOGUES with men in drag - an interesting but tasteless exercise in irony.
Broadway Legend Joined: 12/31/69
Except NO ONE would be offended by men in drag- only by whites playing blacks. It's so deeply ingrained now that even Finian's Rainbow (which is a show about racism and is built around a white man "turning" black) is foregoing it for it's upcoming revival.
I find it fascinating.
And the "King and I" comparison is interesting too. I've never seen a single production of that show that didn't use Non-Asian actors playing Asian.
Broadway Star Joined: 9/8/04
Good for you for actually coming up with a concept. I fail to see how it would work as a vaudeville style show, though. I recently saw it and it was pretty much a drama. I agree that blackface would be a big mistake. Even if it was done way back when.
Broadway Legend Joined: 9/16/07
Joe, I disagree, at least with the women vs blackface part. I think men performing The Vagina Monologues WOULD cause an uproar. Steel Magnolias, not so much. Think about Tropic Thunder. The fuss - if any - was minimal. If you really deconstruct the concept, I think you have a chance. Although there ARE women (and some men) who are offended with drag itself.
As for the King and I, it IS interesting. I'm not sure there is no one who finds it offensive. Like it or not, though, there's much more a cultural history of blackface in and of itself, and I don't think there's a comparable example for asian-american history. Even as I type that, though, I'm not sure that's the acceptable answer.
Isn't there some sort of adage about only mocking/stereotyping those you aren't afraid of?
What's the general line these days about non-hispanic folks playing sharks in West Side Story? Again, there's a question to be raised, but it's not a perfect match with the questions raised by blackface.
Updated On: 7/17/09 at 08:33 PM
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/14/07
I was Meant that theres more resources for the show if produced by an all white cast.
If you don't have talented black students who can do the roles justice, don't do this show. Race is huge and I'd frankly be offended by a white Coalhouse and Sarah. It's not fair to the actors and it's not fair to the material.
I actually have a semi related question.
When The Wiz was announced as the Summer Stars show, I was wondering at the prospect of not having an entirely African-American cast. As in, I was wondering if having a diverse cast of minorities, like African Americans, Hispanics and Asians would work with the purpose of the show. Or is it more tied to African American culture than it is to urban culture?
Yellowface is, unfortunately, seen as much more acceptable than blackface. The problem is that there is no Asian American equivalent to the NAACP, and Asian Americans have been thought of as wallflowers, of not being the type to speak up so it's "okay," of being wimps -- and in some ways, there is some truth to this. In many Asian cultures, you don't rock the boat. And this has been passed on even to 3rd or 4th generation Asian Americans.
However, we're starting to speak up more these days. Which is nice.
http://www.hyphenmagazine.com/blog/
http://angryasianman.com/angry.html
Lizzie, I was watching some of Obama's speech at the NAACP convention on the news the other day, and I'm actually not sure if he referred to Asian Americans. I do know he spoke not only about African Americans, but also Hispanics and Muslim Americas. so it's interesting that you brought that up.
If I'm not mistaken, the original London production of Ragtime utilized a single ensemble for the whites, blacks, and imigrants. They used choreography, costume pieces, and body language to differentiate between the cultural groups.
Videos