qolbinau said: "We *cannot* start to turn this conversation and further divide by cultural identity once we accept we should divide by ethnicity. That leads to a whole bunch of impossible situations to deal with, for example:
* it would mean only Japanese heritage people should be in Pacific Overtures, or Thai people in the King and I. Practically impossible and of course no one would think this. Ethnicity of south East Asian should be sufficient.
* it would mean that only Canadians can play Canadians, Americans American, British British and Australians Australian. Equally absurd, practically impossible. Ethnicity of Caucasian should be enough.
* you are essentially saying Patti LuPone had no business playing an ethnically white woman. Ridiculous - what a talented performance that would have never happened. This is exactly why where possible it’s better to consider the best person for the best role.
* you could take this further and say only gay people can play gay people.
I’m so angry sometimes at my ‘left-wing’ colleagues (a movement I want to be associated with) because they take good ideas and just take them to absurd levels. This slippery slope of infinite divisions is why ‘identity politics’ just can’t always work. You need to be more balanced and realise for both practical and ethical reasons there is a limit to it. Wanting African ethnicity Celie is ok. Not wanting a white woman to play an ethnicallly white woman even if she is the most talented is not ok."
Very well said qolbinau.
The problem is, the left racists don't care about all the points you mention. They don't care if siblings are played by 2 different races, as long as they are not white. The don't care if many roles are cast accurately, as long as it's not white. This is not about accuracy to them, this is about deliberately excluding a race and constantly changing agenda's in favor of the amount of work opportunity for the race of choice. This is, and always has been the core of racism. Doing this "in return" to "get even" is just as disgusting as what happened in the past. This is not the key to equality. It's the opposite. There will NEVER be equality as long as people don't understand this.
This is 1 way race terrorism, and it's exactly what happened back in the day.
In cases like this, these people attack an actress like Sierra to back out because of "accuracy". If we apply this rule to Hamilton, where the fact are that a white male with blue eyes and blond hair did so much against slavery, which was very special in that time, this would mean that only white men should play this role. But no, suddenly the hypocrisy shows, and agenda's are changed. Suddenly historical accuracy is out of the window and the same people suddenly don't care anymore, because in this case it means work opportunity for the race of choice, casting wise. I know this was a deliberate choice of the show, but that does not make it less toxic. You can't change agenda's on a daily basis, as you like. That is not the solution to equality.
Ana Villafañe actually has a great point. She understands that exclusion and widening the gap is not the solution. It's a 2 way street.
I think secretly Sierra is rolling her eyes. It's a Prom concert without scenes, with selections from the show. She has nothing to apologize for. Because radical left wing racism is so accepted nowadays (just like right wing racism was accepted back in the day), both equally toxic and the people didn't realize it, basically brainwashed, not giving in to this attack could potentially harm her career, and that's why she backed out. Comparable things happened with the Great comet, left wing attacks, causing a bigger race gap, leaving hunderds of people without a job. Well done.
Would they have the same reaction at a black Christine in the Phantom of the Opera, daughter of a Swedish violinist in the 19th century? Of course not. Sudden change in agenda and silencing and attacking anybody who comments on it or uses the word "historical accuracy". It's the epitome of hypocrisy.
Again, there will NEVER be equality as long as people use this 1 way street mindset. To get "even". Equality is a 2 way street per definition.
Updated On: 4/24/18 at 07:01 AM