#51
Posted: 3/25/11 at 2:49am
The nuns did not learn how to sing. Delores Van Cartier shows up and they magically sing. This singing lesson was what hooked us in the movie; having us getting to know each nun and watching as each nun discovers her voice. That is all missing here.
I caught the first preview and I have to say that I am a naysaywer. The show is in good shape for a first preview. The only mishap is a gunshot didn't go off. But I thought the book was clunky. It clunked from scene to scene without much imagination and derivitive jokes like having the nuns throw
Yiddishisms in. Didn't we see that in Spamalot when to succeed on Broadway you needed Jews? It seems like a cheap laugh to me.
The songs are derivitive and I found myself missing the movie score. I have heard clips on Amazon and wasn't impressed but waited until I heard them in person before commenting. Derivitve disco songs and ballads. Its hard to believe that this man gave us LIttle Shop, Beauty and the Beast and Little Mermaid.
I put this show in the why category. Why take a really fun movie and make it a mediocre musical. Legally Blonde, Georgy Girl. Singing in the Rain. to name a few duds.
Patina Miller succeeds for the most part. She is likeable but her character is much more self involved than Whoopi's Delores Van Cartier which detracts a bit. The wonderful Victoria Clark
who I felt stole the show as Smitty in How to Succeed some years back, performs in a Thankless role. The actor playing TJ is a stand out and I can't help but watch him every second he is on.
There are minor characters who are given needless songs.
To be fair.. the audience seemed to be having a good time but I can't help wondering if they were friends of the cast it being he first preview night. I also have to admit I felt that maybe I was spoiled by the Book of Mormon which I saw the night before.
Book of Mormon was mature, satircal,witty, irreverent fun. This show was pedestrian. Jerry Zaks has lost his touch.
I predict mixed reviews.
I caught the first preview and I have to say that I am a naysaywer. The show is in good shape for a first preview. The only mishap is a gunshot didn't go off. But I thought the book was clunky. It clunked from scene to scene without much imagination and derivitive jokes like having the nuns throw
Yiddishisms in. Didn't we see that in Spamalot when to succeed on Broadway you needed Jews? It seems like a cheap laugh to me.
The songs are derivitive and I found myself missing the movie score. I have heard clips on Amazon and wasn't impressed but waited until I heard them in person before commenting. Derivitve disco songs and ballads. Its hard to believe that this man gave us LIttle Shop, Beauty and the Beast and Little Mermaid.
I put this show in the why category. Why take a really fun movie and make it a mediocre musical. Legally Blonde, Georgy Girl. Singing in the Rain. to name a few duds.
Patina Miller succeeds for the most part. She is likeable but her character is much more self involved than Whoopi's Delores Van Cartier which detracts a bit. The wonderful Victoria Clark
who I felt stole the show as Smitty in How to Succeed some years back, performs in a Thankless role. The actor playing TJ is a stand out and I can't help but watch him every second he is on.
There are minor characters who are given needless songs.
To be fair.. the audience seemed to be having a good time but I can't help wondering if they were friends of the cast it being he first preview night. I also have to admit I felt that maybe I was spoiled by the Book of Mormon which I saw the night before.
Book of Mormon was mature, satircal,witty, irreverent fun. This show was pedestrian. Jerry Zaks has lost his touch.
I predict mixed reviews.