ErmengardeStopSniveling said: "BeingAlive44Ever said: "Doesn't something somehow feel wrong about calling Harvey a "Featured" actor, though? Even though it's strictly accurate?"
To be clear, I don't reallycare about category placement. It's more on producing strategy or agent politics than content. Same with conversations about who gets the last bow in a musical."
I'm just saying something that kind of ties into the "no small parts" thing, but kind of in reverse. In Harvey's case it's almost like "there are no leading parts, just leading actors." Harvey Fierstein is the very definition of a larger than life performer, and other people have been nominated for similar reasons over time, like Elaine Stritch in Company's original production.
"I know some people here were upset by Mendez going Featured not Lead for Merrily, or both Mormon boys going into Lead, but they're justifiable to me...same with roles like Cassie in A Chorus Line andthe Emcee & Sally in Cabaret being nominated in both Lead and Featured in various productions."
I actually have opinions about that. I think that Lindsay being featured is because Dan was-- that is, they felt like they were a package deal. I personally could see them both as either, but this kind of ties into why I made this topic to begin with: there are some "Featured" performers like Andre De Shields in Hadestown or Dan and Lindsay in Merrily or anybody ever nominated in a Featured category for Falsettos, that have essentially as much material and focus in the story as you would expect from a leading performance. And that makes it so great to see when the teensy tiny roles (comparably so, at least) get nominations. Like, Jacob in La Cage seems like a decently sized role on paper, but when you think of the kind of featured roles that get Tony nominations most of the time, it seems like it stands no chance. But, yes, all of those roles you listed I think can be either leading or featured depending on the production.
The only head-scratchers were when awards used to be strictly based on billing. So Barbara Cook (Marian in Music Man) and Tammy Grimes (the title rolein Unsinkable Molly Brown) winFeatured because they were below the title, or George Rose wins as Lead for Dolittle in MFL because he was above the title."
George Rose is also one of those Harvey Fierstein types that I feel like can only be a Leading Actor. But I agree that it is odd that he was considered Leading for that particular role. There are a lot of instances of this back when they used to more commonly actually operate on whose name was above the title. If we still operated on those as much, I bet you anything Andre De Shields in Hadestown woulda been billed above the title and would have been nominated in the Leading category.