So they announced that this is coming to Chicago next year with Sheryl Lee Ralph, Karen Zeimba and Barbara Walsh with a book by Rupert Holmes and Linda Bloodworth Thomason. How much is this show gonna be like a forgotten episode of "Designing Women"?...
It looks like the creative team agreed with me that there needed to be a new writer for the book. While I'm glad they realized what did not work 5 years ago I still don't think this musical has potential.
A strong whiff of "9 to 5" redux swirls around this enterprise. "9 to 5" has a much stronger story, better plotting, a real villain, and a stronger zeitgeist (women in the office: timeless). The dumped woman for the trophy wife was fairly tired at the time of the film, the movie carried by the stellar casting. Watching three top flight B'way actresses fill the shoes of movie stars -- we've seen that. Has it really worked recently? This show has one thing going for it: the title. But so did the one I mentioned and a couple that closed this season. One wants to wish them the best -- maybe this is the show that will break the curse. But it's weighted with a lot of been there/done that baggage.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
I liked Parton's music in '9 to 5'. I really enjoyed 'Shine Like the Sun' and 'Get Out and Stay Out'. When I went to see the national tour in 2011 there was not much I remembered from it. However, Diana Degarmo who played Doralee did not scream as much that night compared to the time I saw her in 'Brooklyn'. '9 to 5' at least had life after Broadway, despite only running for over 100 performances. It even launched a tour in the U.K.
"It'll have ballads. Our people will have to sing," she explains. "I've been casting in New York and Hollywood, but not picked anyone yet. Stars aren't a requisite. I'm looking for talent. I'm seeing actresses that sing great, do comedy and can get hilarious while hitting a high note."
Bloodworth-Thomason, who also penned 1996's 'First Wives' movie, continues, "It's a talksicle. It's funny and takes place in '92. It's not 'Designing Women,' because that dumb culture's over. It's the feminine side of the '90s. But we didn't use the old script. Didn't even reread it. I don't do rewrites."
The writer, a close friend to Bill and Hillary Clinton, also shared that the power couple are excited to see the project come to fruition. "The Clintons said they'll come to whichever opening we have. It'll be Chicago, best theater in the heart of the country, for six weeks. Our goal's New York next fall."
I just dug up this thread so I could read eye witness reactions. I am probably seeing this in Chicago, and I am way to excited. I want it to be 1 of 2 things, genuinely good, or so terrible that it's brilliant.
Per the press materials, this new incarnation of the show will incorporate Holland Dozier Holland hits like "Stop in the Name of Love" and "Sugar Pie Honey Bunch" amongst the new material written specifically for the piece. Yikes.
Tonya Pinkins: Then we had a "Lot's Wife" last June that was my personal favorite. I'm still trying to get them to let me sing it at some performance where we get to sing an excerpt that's gone.
Tony Kushner: You can sing it at my funeral.
Sometimes when I'm down I reread this thread because it brings me great joy. I almost wish I could get to Chicago to see this, I love a good trainwreck.
Not really a fan of the new artwork, I much preferred the artwork for The Old Globe production. Mainly because the women below don't look anything like the actual actresses.
The picture didn't post. How do I post one on a thread?
Updated On: 12/10/14 at 07:01 PM