ok yall, i am shocked by how much i liked this. its v flawed and ultimately maddening, but in terms of did-you-enjoy-your-2.5hours.... i did.
in fact, this reminded me alot of Lempicka-- a, because everyone i usually agree with hated it, and i didnt, but b, because the performances and the over the top flashiness and song/dance worked even though c, the writers have alot of nerve butchering a story so gallingly.
Like Lempicka, someone made a decision to warp the story to fit a preconceived notion of what the story should be--here perverting a classic piece of literature, which is just as grave a sin, to me, as rewriting history to turn nazi collaborators into lesbian activist heroes. That was a crime, but i still enjoyed the messy flawed result.
Here, too: The WHOLE POINT of Gatsby, and indeed the tragedy, is that Gatsby reinvents himself to become A Rich Guy only to learn that Class carries the day, and more tragically, that his love chooses Class and Status over him. Its an indictment of a segment of society that remains searing today.
But here, they cant let Daisy be emblematic of that ugliness. They must redeem her--and the song she sings at the end is lovely and makes the point well, but this rips the very point of the story out from under the show, AND leaves Daisy a complete shell of a character that never quite comes together. Eva sounds incredible, start to finish, and is perfect on stage. None of this is meant as criticism of her at all.
These changes were meant to Make The Show Acceptable To Modern Audiences but they reek of desperation and fail. With Lempicka I suspect a deluded writer/director got lost in their passion for the project; with Gatbsy I suspect a more calculated business decision was made. Either way, for shame. Daisy is tough, and its hard to convey her mysteriousness/conflict but thats what song is for! Give her some moments to reflect on that choice, or preview her struggle for us! We get none of that.
And that also makes Gatbsy seem unhinged and almost childish in his silly optimism. To be fair, i saw Jeff Kready in the role, and while he looks and sounds the part perfectly, there is a charm/ease that was missing there, and I do not doubt that Jeremy Jordan would have built the character better. But the story ultimately makes little sense as they constructed it, no matter who is playing the role.
And what kills me is that in the areas where i think they CAN/SHOULD play around with the text, they don't. Myrtle, not Daisy, is a nice vehicle to explore the absence of choices for women back then. But they pass that up. (Sara Chase is great). Noah Ricketts wowed me in terms of singing/acting/charm, but I was sure they were making Nick at least sexually fluid until they abruptly had him fall for.... the butch golfer? Yes, Sam Pauly was incredible, and deserves as many roles as we can find for her, truly a natural in every way. And she nails this character--aloof, uninterested in men, critical of the world around her... but then, BAM, thats out the window and we get another insanity: forcing these two into a romantic relationship. Neither Ricketts nor Pauly are served well by this silly romance, which detracts from everything else it seemed they were successfully trying to do.
And after that entire rant, Im still surprised at the lukewarm reception. I thought the sets were big and flashy in all the right ways, I loved the projections, the cars were more than just set pieces and were used well given the plot (another Lempicka comparison!), and while the score wasnt nearly as good/unique as Lempicka's, I certainly enjoyed it a hella lot more than many other more lauded shows this year.
we sat extreme left orchestra, full house (unlike Lempicka, this shows making millions a week, and the audience was beyond enthusiastic start to finish, lots of old ladies from Long Island and groups of high school kids, enthralled). Didnt miss much but obviously the show is best seen from farther back then our Row F. Did not appreciate two ushers siting and whispering throughout act 2- get it together.