Posted: 1/29/22 at 9:07am
BoringBoredBoard40 said: "There is a reason they stopped doing it this way decades ago
First it causes rushed writing, how can you really absorb a show and write a thoughtful piece if you need to get it to your editor a few hours later, also not really considerate of THEIR time that YOU as a producer/show are asking them to give consideration to your show
Their time makes it sound as though they are doing the show a favour. They are not on their time, they are on their publications time. Being a professional critic, is a paid position and a hugely privileged one. The phrase ‘cry me a river’ springs to mind here.
second I thought Ilana Keller from USA Today brought up a good point on twitter
"If there’s a goal of diversifying critics’ voices, maaaaaaybe making moves that make it really difficult for those who don’t live or work in the direct vicinity of the theater district to competitively review your show isn’t the best way to do it"
but regardless of any of that, what a gross ridiculous response from the press rep"
Again, it’s a job. Buy a diary and work out a schedule. Yes, from a show’s point of view it’s good to invite critics who can’t make a certain date, to review another performance and of course they should still do that because it’s potentially for the productions benefit, if it’s a good review. However, a critic moaning that things should be made easier for them is more ‘cry me a river’