Someone please collect the troll?
Back on topic, I've had sort of a fringe-y design idea for a Hair revival that I'm gonna include here. Highly unlikely Jim Rado would ever go for it (assuming he remembered one discussed it with him; he's not 100% all there these days, sadly), but I like it.
I was inspired by an untitled comic by Subnormality and PeopleWatching creator Winston Rowntree about two kids, a guy and a girl, who run into each other on the way to some event. They're kind of flirty, she wants to draw comics, a few political references that could apply to any era are sprinkled in, and then there's a horrific twist ending (you have to check the last page carefully for a caption at the very bottom when you read it to know that an historical event is being referenced) that I won't spoil. Read it for yourself. I liked that twist of not knowing until the very end that the comic is not set in the time period the reader automatically assumes, and though the parallel would not be 100%, I'd like to attempt something similar -- albeit mildly more palatable for "the old guard" -- with Hair.
Namely, we open the show with a look apparently hearkening back to hippie days (with one or two modern pieces, or at least neutral period-appropriate clothing not dissimilar to today’s fashions, but definitely not overtly hippie), and gradually introduce more later looks/fashions/etc. (not a hop through the decades, straight to now) until, come the finale, the clothing and whatnot is up to date. Perhaps the protest/rally has the odd poster with references that may have current application as well. The point of all this modernity bleeding through and then taking over is to drive home the story's timelessness. The comparison isn't perfect (let's face it, Hair talks about the times it takes place in every five seconds, the exact same execution would be impossible), but I'd like to achieve a similar effect to Rowntree's comic, to give the audience that unsettling realization of how far we still have to go, where people are like "Okay, that's still the show I know, but they looked like kids today and didn't sound that different either..."
It'd take some adjusting for the audience, both newbies and longtime fans, but I think it'd emphasize the show's message and accent the characters' personalities, while bringing something new to the piece, especially for those that only know it for three out-of-context radio hits. Further, this gradual progression would both establish that the show is still set in the Sixties and potentially off-set the awful feeling some people who lived through the era get when they see actors trying to look and act like hippies.
On another costume design note, I also think it's important to remember that, regardless of era, we're dealing with a group of New York street urchins. These kids don't have money and are almost always seen outside, so the dressier fashions of the time wouldn't be appropriate. Indeed, the reality of what "living on the street" means in a contemporary context is very incongruous with the makeshift, day-to-day living of liberated NYC youth of the Sixties and Seventies; it might be interesting if this Tribe singing about their idyllic community look, smell, and act more like today's homeless than a Sixties costume party.
Formerly gvendo2005
Broadway Legend
joined: 5/1/05
Blocked: After Eight, suestorm, david_fick, emlodik, lovebwy, Dave28282, joevitus, BorisTomashevsky, Seb28
Updated On: 7/3/19 at 10:23 AM