I've been told that they are indeed doing one of the large group numbers at the parade. I found the material with the guys at the shipyard the most interesting, and I'm surprised they haven't been trying to use that to sell the show more.
So they're probably doing We've Got Now't Else at the parade. I think they made great choices showcasing Rachel on Jimmy Fallon and When We Dance on the morning shows. People here were complaining they were tired of the stomping men from the commercial, and now everyone is wondering why they haven't been doing that number more?
So, if those other shows had gone into other theaters, they would have become long-running hits? I saw a few of those, and they would have flopped in any house.
huh i think i said this about 3 weeks ago..someone told me i had no idea what I was talking about. Hogans...how is it going?
"The production has been reportedly losing $75,000 a week since performances began on Sept. 29. According to the Times, it needs to gross at least $625,000 a week to break even and to sustain a Broadway run."
Sting coming in for a few weeks is a band aid at best. I applaud him for fighting for his show but the show tanks again after he leaves. This leaves about 2 1/2 months before business MIGHT pick up. The Christmas holidays do not appear to be helping the box office Too little to late
If he played in it for the the 3 months of dead time, it might make a difference. Sadly this will only prolong the agony
Not sure I would call Jackie a small role. According to the NYTimes, he is in 40 percent of the show. He does a lot of singing. I hope this stunt works out for the show and they can somehow make it to the Tonys in June, but it's a crapshoot. In spite of its flaws, this show is just too good for the kinds of audiences that now fill B'way theaters. IMHO so you can keep your outrage in check
Nail was terrible in the role. He like did this weird speak sing stuff. So I'd be curious to hear Sting do it. I don't think it's going to help a ton though.
"In spite of its flaws, this show is just too good for the kinds of audiences that now fill B'way theaters. IMHO"
Can't you just praise a show without denigrating people with higher standards than you?
I'm curious why they can muck about with the casting and try to get audiences in there, but they never say, hey, Logan, why not try and fix that book up a bit? Why does that become a sacred document on opening night?
"In spite of its flaws, this show is just too good for the kinds of audiences that now fill B'way theaters."
And the audiences know it too! In fact this was overheard at the TKTS booth: "Sorry but we have nothing left for CABARET. Have you considered THE LAST SHIP?" "We did and it looks amazing, so amazing in fact that we're not feeling worthy of having the opportunity to witness such a magnificent piece of theater so we'd better see something else".
It's not really a family show nor one I can imagine the tourists will flock to. This may help in the short term but I'm not convinced it's a long term solution.
Ah the book, the book , the book. Yes, the book to Mamma Mia is perfectly intelligent, the book for Phantom of the Opera and Wicked make total sense, Disney books are the epitome of brilliant librettos, the books for Beautiful and Rock of Ages deserved Pulitzer Prizes, the book for Once and Book of Mormon are the pantheon of tightly constructed librettos and let's not forget Kinky Boots' and Newsies' books, so rock solid and non-manipulative. FAR FROM PERFECT books have been a part of musicals that have run for years and years. A composer (twice nominated for a Tony Award and the recipient of Drama Desk Award and a Gold Record) once told me that book writers are always criticized first and most harshly because every "critic" can read and write and, therefore, he feels he knows something about actual libretto writing (which is hogwash). Composers, he said, can often escape the contempt of "critics" because most people know nothing about musical composition and only know what sounds pleasant to them. While I enjoyed a couple of the shows I cite above, NONE of them can lay claim to a libretto that ranks with the best of the Golden Age (and even some of Hammerstein's and George Abbott's books can be taken to task if we really get down to it.)
Yes, Logan's book has holes and stretches credibility (Emil De Becque proposes before he even tells Nellie about his children?), but come on. It is no worse than any libretto mentioned above. However, what it has is Sting's score, one of the best currently heard on B'way. Had this show starred Hugh Jackman tickets would be impossible. Oh, yes, let's not forget that smash, The Boy From Oz! A paint by numbers butt numbing libretto.)
Is this called rearranging the deckchairs on the titanic. The producers have also blamed a wrong marketing strategy of focusing on shipbuilding rather than a love story. Surely making a video that looked like a beer advert rather than clips form the actual show was questionable. I would question some of the marketing decisions for the show since the tryout.
I want a lot of things, but that doesn't mean they're going to happen. Let's wait and see...there are more shows coming in the spring. It's a tough sell. The show as a whole is just rough (it could've used another tryout with serious changes).
Well of course, but Seller is the one who has to pull the plug. That's what I'm saying. He has more faith in it than most people and he has to make the decision.
Well Disney may want that theater for Hunchback in the fall (they usually use Nederlander). There is also a clause probably where they can be forced out.