Posted: 5/16/16 at 7:12pm
Granted, it was two seconds, but Laverne looked pretty great.
Posted: 5/16/16 at 7:15pm
it just looks so cheaply done.
Posted: 5/16/16 at 7:18pm
Terrible. Are these just hastily shot clips or is this actually what it's going to look like?
Posted: 5/16/16 at 7:30pm
CindersGolightly said: "
This one has yet to be posted here. Or on BroadwayWorld. Seems like they have just been getting their pictures exclusively from this thread, as usual. Again, a wig for Victoria Justice would have been great. But I'm loving all of their looks, especially Riff and Columbia. Rosscoe, I'd guess October, given the Halloween feel, but there isn't a specific date yet. Sometime in the Fall.
I am curious to know why you wish they would have wigged Victoria Justice. Susan Sarandon didn't wear a wig in the 1975 film and she was just fine. Since when does the role of "Janet" require a wig?
Posted: 5/16/16 at 8:01pm
I don't know how I feel about the trailer...
Posted: 5/16/16 at 8:12pm
I had ZERO expectations that this would be good and that teaser made me think even less of the whole stupid thing.
Posted: 5/16/16 at 8:44pm
Posted: 5/16/16 at 10:02pm
Posted: 5/16/16 at 10:10pm
CarlosAlberto said: "I am curious to know why you wish they would have wigged Victoria Justice. Susan Sarandon didn't wear a wig in the 1975 film and she was just fine. Since when does the role of "Janet" require a wig?"
I just wish Victoria as Janet had curly hair rather than straight hair. That's all.
Posted: 5/17/16 at 12:08am
I have had no desire to see this after they announced that Cox wax playing Frank. You don't cast a famous trangendered person to play a man who is a transvestite. Cox is a woman and looks it in these pics and trailers. You knew Frank was a man. I will most likely see this on demand only for Annaleigh. JMO
Posted: 5/17/16 at 1:06pm
CindersGolightly said: "CarlosAlberto said: "I am curious to know why you wish they would have wigged Victoria Justice. Susan Sarandon didn't wear a wig in the 1975 film and she was just fine. Since when does the role of "Janet" require a wig?"
I just wish Victoria as Janet had curly hair rather than straight hair. That's all.
That doesn't necessitate a wig, what she would need is a curling iron. LOL.
Posted: 5/17/16 at 1:25pm
This production doesn't need a curling iron, it needs a wrecking ball.
Posted: 5/17/16 at 1:40pm
I didn't say curling iron because some of the first moments of the show are spent in the rain. 
I like what I'm seeing so far, to be quite honest. I genuinely think Laverne will turn out an incredible performance, and in the trailer, it doesn't look nearly as cheap as the small handful of set photos we have.
Posted: 5/17/16 at 1:52pm
Jordan Catalano said: "This production doesn't need a curling iron, it needs a wrecking ball.
Posted: 5/17/16 at 2:04pm
Who's playing shirtless Brad there?
He's hot as s hit.
Updated On: 5/17/16 at 02:04 PM
Posted: 5/17/16 at 4:19pm
I must be missing some footage. All I saw were a couple of one liners, in closeup. I wasn't aware of a cheap set, because I didn't really see one. The few inches of set that showed looked like the movie, which had the cheapest and trashiest set (on purpose) you could imagine.
How can anyone judge a film from a 30 second clip. I'll judge when I see the entire film.
Posted: 5/17/16 at 6:12pm
lovebwy said: "Who's playing shirtless Brad there?
He's hot as s hit.
That is Ryan McCartan
Here he is in his "Floor Show" costume:
The costume is hella-ugly
Updated On: 5/17/16 at 06:12 PM
Posted: 6/10/16 at 6:18pm
Did anyone see the new promo??
Their tagline is apparently "Let there be Lips" O.o
Posted: 6/10/16 at 6:46pm
She looks great! I like the tagline. It's odd in a good way and it feels fresh and new. I wonder if they'll do a promo like this for other characters.
Posted: 6/10/16 at 7:17pm
I believe "Let There Be Lips" is a call out from the midnight screenings.
Posted: 6/10/16 at 7:57pm
Ah! makes sense. Most likely not a tagline then.
Posted: 7/11/16 at 10:09pm
Updated On: 7/11/16 at 10:09 PM
Posted: 7/12/16 at 2:24am
Whoa! I liked that! I like the updated fishnets.
Updated On: 7/12/16 at 02:24 AM
Posted: 7/12/16 at 8:45am
I am really on the fence about this. The original is so iconic and was truly groundbreaking. It was so ahead of it's time that many did not get it or truly understand it. It really took some time for the general public to catch up to it, but once it did it got the recognition it deserved.
I see very little to improve upon and there's really no need to introduce this to a new generation by producing a new version, it's been handed down generation to generation.
The last midnight screening I went to more than half of the audience was made up of a mix of high school and/or college students.
Updated On: 7/12/16 at 08:45 AM
