Idiot said: "joevitus said: "Seb28 said: "I hope he has learned his lesson and understands the difference between "free speech"and "deliberatelytelling lies on tv about the motives of the terrorist" now. Because the latter is supportingterrorism. Because it lays the foundation for approving these deeds.
Also, it would be interesting to see what happens if people on the right side of history also cancel their subscriptions now."
Silly scolding post. He had no lesson to learn. His comments were factual, regarding both MAGA(which, from the start,was trying to put the blame as far from themselves as they could) and Trump (whose "mourning" for Kirk seemed odd, as it appeared to involve only excitement over the contiued construction of that pointless ballroom)."
You are completely correct, Joevitus. MAGA was absolutely trying to pin blame on 'anyone but themselves'. Kimmel's statement was factual. Only MAGA ears would hear otherwise. Poor, pathetic fools."
Actually, I thought Kimmel called out pretty accurately what the Republicans were doing in the wake of Kirk's death. It appeared to be a united, coordinated effort to seize the situation as a political opportunity, with the tragedy serving only as a backdrop. They so want this to be their Reichstag Fire moment. And he NEVER said that the assassin was MAGA, he only said that the Republicans were tripping all over themselves to dismiss any thought by anyone that he might be. Another truth by Kimmel.
Kimmel's greatest sin was not anything he said, but his failure to anticipate a reaction from a a political movement that has such contempt for the truth that they routinely torture the truth until it tells them exactly what they need for it to justify their festering hatred for "the other".