Weird Tony Decisions
#1Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 8:56am
-Daisy Eagan winning in the best featured actress category. Wasn't she in practically every scene? Seems like a leading role to me.
-Emily Skinner and Alice Ripley sharing a nomination. I get why they nominated them together, but at the same time they were paying two very different characters.
-Fiorello and The Sound of Music tying for best musical. Having done both shows regionally, I feel that "Sound of Music" is far superior to "Fiorello" which really does not stand the test of time (many of the lyrics are amusingly misogynistic).
#3re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 11:15am
The Tony slip-up the FIORELLO/ SOUND OF MUSIC was not that both of those shows won. It was that GYPSY didn't.
I didn't know Skinner and Ripley shared a nomination. That's odd.
#4re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 11:19amIn 2003, the one-man show "Say Goodnight, Gracie", starring Frank Gorshin, was nominated for Best Play, but Gorshin did NOT receive a Best Actor nomination.
#5re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 11:26amOh, yes. Gorshin was tremendous- absolutely tremendous. I saw him on tour the night before he passed away. He definitely deserved a nomination, if not a sentimental win.
#6re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 11:30amI assume the reasoning behind the joint-nomination was that one performance would not have been as powerful without the other.
#7re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 11:57am
Alice Ripley was alone in the Best Actress category at the Drama Desks.
Another that I can think of- George Hearn's random nomination for his leading actor work in "Putting It Together."
Ruthie Henshall and Carol Burnett should have been recognized for their work in that musical revue. Both were fabulous, especially Henshall, who should have been nominated over Ann Hampton Callaway (in "Swing!).
#8re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 11:59amamericanboy99 ~ I believe it was AFTER those nominations (Drama Desk) that the producers petitioned for them to be considered together. I remember reading the reasoning somewhere...but I forget and don't have time to search at the moment (lunch is over).
LIVE THAT LESSON!!!!!!
Okayfine
Stand-by Joined: 6/2/08
#9re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:03pmThe whole Sunset Blvd thing just blew my mind. If no one liked the show & it had no competition (egads, I can't remember the one other nominated musical that year - someone help me out!), why bother? It just draws attention to the dreck being played that year.
#10re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:05pm
"If no one liked the show & it had no competition (egads, I can't remember the one other nominated musical that year - someone help me out!), why bother?"
I actually really liked the show? And so did the majority of the critics, and a lot of people.
It was nominated against the long-running review Smokey Joe's Cafe.
#11re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:06pmTammy Grimes winning Best Supporting (at the time) Actress for her performance in the TITLE role of THE UNSINKABLE MOLLY BROWN.
#12re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:14pm
This is like total SP love right here:
-Terrence Mann deserved a Tony nom. in 1998 as Best Featured Actor for The Scarlet Pimpernel.
-Douglas Sills was practically the life of the show, and also in it's future incarnations (although who would have known there'd be 4 versions!); I actually was hoping he'd get the Tony!
And about the Emily Skinner/Alice Ripley thing...I thought then and still think that they did that because there was just no more room in the category. I probably would have thrown Christine Andreas in there too, but she certainly would have been the last one to get it in that category. There were 6 phenomenal actresses that year (atleast I can't remember them ALL!) and they honestly probably did not want to snub either of them.
Okayfine
Stand-by Joined: 6/2/08
#13re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:22pm
If memory serves, Philly03, a majority of the critics did NOT like the show. They liked the costumes (well-done), the set (fascinating), Glenn Close (not a fan, but I hear she did very well), & a few of the songs. They didn't think it was a brilliant piece of musical theatre, though, more of a spectacle. Not arguing with the value of spectacle, btw. I like it as much as the next person.
The general opinion was that the only reason it won a Tony for Best Musical was because it wasn't up against anything original. Smoky Joe's Cafe (thanks for the memory jog, btw!) was debated as Best Musical because it was a review & folks questioned its originality, not as big of a issue these days.
#14re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:26pm
With Daisy Egan I think they probably thought she had a better chance of winning in the Featured category - I guess they just didn't petition to have her as lead?
I thought Alice and Emily should have been nominated seperately. Ok actually I would have been ok with just Alice, if it was a space thing.
That WAS a good year for lead actress, I feel like that catagory was THICK with amazing people and then there were people left out...
Add me to the list of people who had a good time at Sunset Boulevard. I was 15 and it appealed to my melodramatic side.
#15re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:37pm
"I thought Alice and Emily should have been nominated seperately. Ok actually I would have been ok with just Alice, if it was a space thing."
Yes but then Emily probably would have felt like ****. HAHAH. They were basically ONE on stage.
And I was always one for allowing THE SCARLET PIMPERNEL to be re-nominated in the 1999 Tony's with SP2. It really was so different, new cast (except for Sills, which I could have seen & would have left out of nominations). It certainly would have been better to see SP2 nominated then Frank Wildhorn's trainwreck known as The Civil War! Of course they got shot down, but it would have been weirder to see it get re-nom.! And after trying so hard with SP2, I was shocked that they didn't even attempt with SP3, which actually was completely different from SP1! Ah SP you never cease to amaze! Atleast they ggot to "continously" run?!
SporkGoddess
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/27/05
#16re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:38pmThe Lion King winning over Ragtime, and Fosse winning over Parade.
#17re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:40pmWhat about the decision to nominate all seven Von Trapp children in the best featured actress category that year?
DrewBill
Stand-by Joined: 4/22/08
#18re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:48pmOr how about the new Tony for replacement performances ("The Reba McEntire Award") -- an award that has never actually been awarded.
#19re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:55pmRodgers and Hammerstein receiving a best score nomination in 1996 for State Fair!
#21re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 12:57pm
I was going to mention the nod for all the Von Trapp kids or to the ensemble from La Plume de ma Tante or to the two actors from SIZWE BANZI....
Unknown User
Joined: 12/31/69
#23re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 1:36pm
Okay, imagine if Alice Ripley had been nominated for a Tony and Emily Skinner hadn't... Do you really want to be attached to the bitch who got a Tony nod over you every single night for the rest of the run?
Seriously speaking, I just figure that the Tony committee agreed to nominate them together because their performances probably complemented each other too much.
I agree that the only odd thing about the FIORELLO and THE SOUND OF MUSIC tie was that that was the year GYPSY was nominated.
#24re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 1:45pm
"Okay, imagine if Alice Ripley had been nominated for a Tony and Emily Skinner hadn't... Do you really want to be attached to the bitch who got a Tony nod over you every single night for the rest of the run?"
Actually, Side Show closed a few months prior to the Tony noms.
Current Saying: What do you mean it isn't enough being pretty? Have you seen my headshots?!?
#25re: Weird Tony Decisions
Posted: 7/8/08 at 1:45pmOh really? Well...there goes that theory.
Videos










