Well, clearly Mr. Larson thought that his time frame was near enough to the end. Who knows? Maybe if he were around to make the movie, he would've dictated that it should have been set in 1992.
Surely the creative team *did* catch it, but had to make the best choice they could given the problems. It wasn't going to be perfect, no matter what. Why? Because. I guess they decided that the Thelma and Louise thing would just have to slide, for the sake of the big picture.
Like I said, I'm fairly sure this is addressed by the cast/creative powers themselves on the Rent blog. Unless one of us is an actor or otherwise made this movie, you're looking in the wrong place if you want specific answers.
We could sit here and study the timeline for the availability of AZT, and how likely it would be that people like Mimi and Roger could get it in 1989, or we could try to find out when the East Village would most likely be as it should be in Rent, but the fact of the matter remains that if one fits, another is going to contradict.
I'm sure they didn't just pull 1989 out of a hat.
A work of art is an invitation to love.
Updated On: 1/2/06 at 03:57 PM