WHat are shows where you would much rather recommend a revival or studio recording over the original cast album--and which recording? Obviously a lot of these examples would be shows from before the mid 50s or so, when aural quality wasn't so great and much of the music would be missing (although I admit I still more often than not play the old Rodgers and Hammerstein original cast albums over revival ones, partly out of habit and for the performances).
I much prefer the 10th anniversary cast of Les Miserables to the original. I prefered Ruthie's Fantine to Patti's Fantine. I also love Salonga's Fantine but the rest of that cast is hit or miss and in general not up to the standard of the 10th anniversary dream cast.
I much prefer the 10th anniversary cast of Les Miserables to the original. I prefered Ruthie's Fantine to Patti's Fantine. I also love Salonga's Fantine but the rest of that cast is hit or miss and in general not up to the standard of the 10th anniversary dream cast.
Well I didn't want to get into it, but he's a Satanist.
Every full moon he sacrifices 4 puppies to the Dark Lord and smears their blood on his paino.
This should help you understand the score for Wicked a little bit more.
Tazber's: Reply to
Is Stephen Schwartz a Practicing Christian
I'd probably have to say Oliver! too. Though the "best" recording would have to be a mixture of the 1994 London Palladium and 2008 Drury Lane cast recordings.
Forum is much better recorded and has much more music in the revival but I admit I kinda like the clunky charm of the original--and the more unique original orchestrations (which I believe had no violins)--as well as prefer Miles in his original vocal key.
Follies is obviously one that will probably come back--I probably play the Papermill (and no doubt the new one) as much or more than the original cast album, but it's hard to fairly say since I just love that original cast so much.
WHile I kinda miss the cut songs, I'm sure many listen to the soundtrack of Sound of Music over the 1959 recording.
(I also have never understood the love for the Australian Nine).
The OBC is far better than the OLC, but the Aussie Cats is complete. The Hamburg one is my fave, also complete, but obviously in german.
When Phantom 25th comes out I think I personally will prefer it over the OLC, again, just because it is complete (I hope, havent heard it yet)
And though this may not count, I prefer the Evita movie soundtrack above all others, yes the singing could be better but the orchestrations are so lush.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27199361@N08/ Phantom at the Royal Empire Theatre
I would have to say that I prefer the symphonic recording of Miss Saigon over the London cast recording.
"If you try to shag my husband while I am still alive, I will shove the art of motorcycle maintenance up your rancid little Cu**. That's a good dear"
Tom Stoppard's Rock N Roll
I may be slaughtered for saying this, but I enjoy the 1967 cast of Dolly, led by "Miss Purlie Mae" outshines the 1964 cast led by Dolly Levi... I mean Carol Channing... I always get those two mixed up. lol.
I also agree with the 2008 Revival of Sout Pacific.
"We'll serve anyone, meaning Anyone and to ANYONE at all!"
I've always liked the London Concert recording of "Nine" with Jonathan Pryce the best - huge orchestra and male/female chorus. I know that's not the intention of the original production, but man does the score sound good.
i agree Mermansman, and it's no disrespect to Carol. It's just that Bailey, besides being, like Channing, a hell of a performer, was one of the greatest singers who ever lived.
I'm just going to say it. The London revival recording of She Loves Me trumps the original Broadway. Why? Ruthie. But, the orchestrations are beautiful
Lansbury's "Gypsy". The only flaw is the british accent of the newsboys.
"Carson has combined his passion for helping children with his love for one of Cincinnati's favorite past times - cornhole - to create a unique and exciting event perfect for a corporate outing, entertaining clients or family fun."
HAIR (like the 2005 and 2009 versions much better) SOUTH PACIFIC (the 2008 revival outshines the others) HELLO, DOLLY (I like the Mary Martin and Pearl Bailey versions) MISS SAIGON (1995 symphonic version is the best, although that Kim and Chris are not my faves) OLIVER (1994 and 2009 versions are much more listenable)
"How could she just suddenly, completely disappear into thin water?" - The Little Mermaid
Most of them, to be honest. I usually prefer revival recordings because they're often more complete. Plus, a lot of the classic musicals have revival recordings with stellar leads like the Carousel recording with Audra McDonald and Oklahoma with Hugh Jackman.
LITTLE ME: The Martin Short recording has overall peppier tempos, better singing from most of the lads, and I happen to enjoy the comedy better on that recording. Maybe Sid Caesar was much funnier in the book scenes, as some have said, but the verve he brought the roles he played does not translate on the syrupy cast recording.