kdogg36 said: "This move was supported by Clinton as well:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-calls-strikes-syrian-airfields/story?id=46635881
But we always knew there would be more wars whoever was elected.
"
I don't know why I opened Pandora's Box by going into the Off Topic section, let alone commenting on one, but THIS RIGHT HERE. It was either Agent Orange idiocy and all the utter nonsense he'd pull (I've lost count) and fake law changes that still only benefit the financial elites and get into a financial crisis, and still go to war (no matter what anyone says, only the top benefit from a so called Repub "smaller gov't) or it was Hillary who'd spend us into oblivion, expand gov't to a dangerous level, STILL get into a financial crisis because you can't spend a country into prosperity ( sorry y'all) and STILL go to war even with her fake promises of "bridges not walls"...I foresaw all this tension coming for 3-4 years now, but no one listened. I've said for a long time now, no matter who is the next President, we're headed towards another major social upheaval and reset. All we're doing is changing the players of the political game, the political game itself isn't being changed. Until/unless the game itself is changed, nothing else WILL change and we're still heading for a major societal upset as I've been predicting for these past few years, no matter who was President and I haven't liked any of the past few. It's unavoidable at this point. But no one listened to me... It was either Trump and his complete unqualified insanity with his "evilness' being easily visible or Hillary and her being TOO qualified which means she knows how to "game the system more easily" as it were, so therefore her shady dealings and own brand of 'evil' is more shrouded in secrecy and shade. Our Founders were not career politicians, and they never intended this sort of thing to BE a career. When politics became a career is when this all went downhill. So we needed a balance. Someone who isn't a career politician, but still knows what the hell they're doing. Our choices in November were neither of these things. BALANCE BALANCE BALANCE. On EVERYTHING. This lack of balance in the current socioeconomic climate is what causes social collapse...every.single.time. Divide and conquer. They divided. Now they're in the process of conquering. That should terrify anyone. No matter who's the "leader".
And as the old sayings go "For evil to have ether upper hand it must disguise itself" or "Real evil doesn't wave it's banner proclaiming it's evil, it's slithers like a snake in the grass". This are real life truths that must be remembered. I'm not saying #45 isn't his own brand of evil and ridiculousness but his brand is just more upfront, undisguised, and it's a banner being waved, which makes his brand more easy to defeat. Evil is easy to defeat when it's easy to spot. He's more like the Disney villain that you can spot from a mile away, therefore you can easily defeat them. But Hillary was "snake in the grass" disguising itself which makes that brand harder to defeat. So what does that say about the choices we had? Was there really a lesser of two evils? The Devil doesn't go around proclaiming it's the Devil...it disguises, counterfeits, pretends, twists, etc. Real evil pretends it's good to have that upper hand. That's why real evil so scary because it's hard to spot. At least we can spot Trump's brand....
I'm out...and hopefully won't return to this part of the board...at least for a while.