I respectfully take issue with "Well-Known."
It's as though one would try to imply that any certain performer is somehow validated or placed above other performers simply for the fact that they have been exploited by popular media (mostly for being white and attractive -- unless they're a man, in which case they only have to be white).
What really defines "Well-Known," and what about it makes it a desirable category to be placed in? Does it have to do with climbing the Hollywood ladder by sleeping with the right people, marrying a man 25 years your senior and as a result being given an opportunity at "stardom" and popular awards recognition, having your personal life plastered all over trashy magazines and somehow as a result being envied by the mainstream public who are made to feel mediocre by the glamour of your exploitation?
(Just a thought. Didn't intend to threadjack. And please do not take this as an attack on you, Cruel, or anyone else in this thread. The title just got me thinking.)
"Winning a Tony this year is like winning Best Attendance in third grade: no one will care but the winner and their mom."
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)