AN AMERICAN IN PARIS Previews — Page 5
Posted: 3/19/15 at 2:56pm
They can't take that away from me was sung by Henri, Jerry, and Adam. What i meant was that Adam leads the song for for some strange reason, when it logically should be sung by Jerry as he is the character the audience is supposed to sympathize with the most.
@McFan2: there is no tap, only softshoe in Stairway to Paradise, which is a Zigfeld/classic showgirls and softshoe number. My friend and I spent the entire number trying to figure out whether it was softshoe or tap because we kept hearing thuds instead of clicks.
Updated On: 3/19/15 at 02:56 PM
Posted: 3/19/15 at 3:20pm
Posted: 3/19/15 at 3:43pm
Posted: 3/19/15 at 9:35pm
It succeeds if you want pure, well done ballet typically not seen on Broadway. It's very well choreographed. But the show, on the whole, leaves something to be desired.
Posted: 3/20/15 at 11:29pm
Posted: 3/21/15 at 11:27am
Posted: 3/21/15 at 12:01pm
I have to admit that the movie never engaged me as a story - it seemed pretty thin and formulaic - just an excuse for music and dancing. And the changes in the book for this production - such as they are - don't change that impression. It ain't Shakespeare in either medium.
brdwy411 identified one source of dissatisfaction that I had but didn't consciously realize: the songs all felt cut short (unless they were morphing into a dance number). I love "But Not for Me", for example, but it felt like a 45 second promo rather than a full song. And the two songs before it were also shortened into a kind of "medley": "Who Cares?" and "For You, For Me, Forevermore." I wanted to hear those songs sung and developed and they weren't.
No matter how negative some opinions are, this was (for me) worth seeing. Too much dance for my companion, though, who left at intermission. Still glad I didn't read this thread until forming my own opinion.
Posted: 3/25/15 at 12:25am
Posted: 3/30/15 at 2:06pm
Posted: 3/30/15 at 5:31pm
Posted: 3/31/15 at 7:42am
Posted: 3/31/15 at 10:26am
Posted: 3/31/15 at 10:41am
Posted: 3/31/15 at 11:01am
Posted: 3/31/15 at 11:02am
Posted: 4/1/15 at 9:32pm
Curious3, you said exactly what I had been trying to articulate in my mind as I've read the comments posted to date. Nicely put.
Posted: 4/1/15 at 11:00pm
Daddy, 3 weeks of previews so far in the 90% range...what does that tell you?
Previews are heavily papered but the show so far is off to a good start.
https://www.broadwayworld.com/grosses/AN-AMERICAN-IN-PARIS
Posted: 4/2/15 at 1:21am
Looked sold out in orchestra tonight. Really liked the show. Audience ate it up. Very much a dance oriented show.
Posted: 4/2/15 at 10:56am
I'm seeing it next Wednesday, and seat choices were becoming increasingly harder to come by for that performance. Not sold out, but a pretty booked out theater it looks like. Looking forward to seeing it.
Posted: 4/2/15 at 11:41am
Thanks a lot Robbie2. Does "papered" mean comped/discounted?
Posted: 4/2/15 at 5:10pm
Saw this last week, and I wish I could say it made more of an impression on me. It's a perfectly entertaining evening without being, in any way, a must-see. Well, I guess it's a must-see for those of us in the community (because we have to see everything), but it's not something I would tell out-of-towners they'd have to rush to.
Robert Fairchild and Leanne Cope are, of course, superb dancers, so it's a great pleasure to sit back, relax and watch them do their thing. The problem comes when they open their mouths. Despite lovely, light singing voices, they're not the kind of triple threats strong enough to carry an entire evening's entertainment. Bottom line, they really can't act. And as written, she spends most of her time whining about how she can't allow herself to fall for Fairchild's character and he's so much of a cipher you end up wanting her to marry the charming, handsome Max von Essen instead.
I wasn't crazy about the additional music choices, all of which seemed either expected and cliche ("The Man I Love,""But Not for Me,""They Can't Take That Away from Me") or 2nd tier Gershwin (For You, For Me, For Evermore"). And in endeavoring to bulk up the story and make everyone more three dimensional, book writer Craig Lucas only darkens what should be frothy fun. Yes, of course, the plight of the Jews during WWII fits naturally into the storyline, but everyone is so damned unhappy for the bulk of Act II that I found such plot points additional, unnecessary downers.
Visually the show is one of the most gorgeous things I've ever seen. Bob Crowley has absolutely outdone himself. His set design, in conjunction with the projections of 59 Productions, is almost certain to win him another Tony Award, and rightly so. And kudos to first-time director Christopher Wheeldon for using the set and set pieces in such imaginative ways. The fluidity of movement -- the way the whole show is choreographed, if you will -- is very impressive. As is the actual choreography, of course. And yet...
Watching "On the Town" yesterday afternoon -- for the third time -- I was struck by how brilliantly funny and theatrical is Joshua Bergasse's choreography for that show. Wheeldon's work is certainly accomplished -- balletic and beautiful -- but it lacks the brashness, bite and sense of humor that would elevate it to the level of Broadway choreography that we associate with the great ones: Gower Champion, Susan Stroman, most recently Casey Nicholaw. By the time the actual "American in Paris" ballet happened, my thoughts were leaning a little bit towards, "Oh, great, more ballet..."
I'm happy I saw the show, but this is one of those instances in which I really did go out humming the sets.
Posted: 4/3/15 at 1:50am
Just wanted to say I love your screen name: LucyEth!!!
BroadwayWorld TV