Scarywarhol said: "Please. Someone make a compelling argument for most musicals being important. I love good musicals, otherwise I wouldn't be here. But I don't think it's controversial to say that well over half of them are fluff, not good, or both. I'd say that about most forms. "
For me, I don't see the opposite of important/truly important as being fluff, but I get your basic point. Doesn't this all come down to the different ways we can define important? Creating a shared entertainment experience is important in its own ways and most, if not all, musicals (and other forms of art) do that.
But if we are talking about art forms and performances having a greater impact on individual or social consciousness, many do not. And I think that's OK. However, we have several on the boards right now that can/do, not just Spring Awakening. After seeing The Color Purple, I had lengthy conversations with friends about slavery, race, and misogyny. The King and I offers opportunities to have all kins of discussions about globalization, class, and more. Fun Home opens our eyes to sexual and gender identity and family dynamics. And of course, then we've got Hamilton. And other examples exist.
What makes this production of Spring Awakening truly important in my eyes is that it is amplifying attention on a population that traditionally is very under-served in mainstream theatre, both on stage and among the audience members. I sat among primarily hearing impaired and deaf individuals when I saw the show last week, and the joy on their faces was overwhelming.
Updated On: 11/29/15 at 07:08 PM