I saw the matinee this past Saturday with my husband and a friend. Our seats were dead center of orchestra row D. My husband is not a Meat Loaf fan and had virtually no interest, so I was basically dragging him along; the friend is a lover of almost every style of music, but particularly classic rock, and he was very eager to see this show.
My friend and I loved it, but the big surprise came from my husband, who said "That was fabulous! Best show of the trip and I would see it again in a heartbeat." (For reference, we also saw Hadestown, Moulin Rouge, The Prom, To Kill a Mockingbird, and Be More Chill).
I'm a bit confused by the comments suggesting surprise and/or disappointment that this show is "campy", "over the top", and "bombastic". These are signature elements of all Jim Steinman compositions, including the namesake album. I struggle to understand how anyone who has heard his music could possibly have been expecting something serious here, as Mr. Steinman almost always writes with tongue firmly planted in cheek; one need only review a list of his song titles to know this (e.g., Objects in the Rear View Mirror May Appear Closer Than They Are). In interviews, he has often described his style as "Wagnerian rock", and Bat Out of Hell: The Musical is a perfectly logical and appropriate use of Mr. Steinman's catalog.
Another common criticism is that the plot is "thin". Bat Out of Hell is basically yet another Romeo & Juliet story, not terribly dissimilar from the story being presented over at Hadestown, but with a fresh twist:
Click Here To Toggle Spoiler Content
A love triangle involves a boy who is also in love with the Romeo character, which proves to be a somewhat pivotal plot point. Given that the Steinman/Meat Loaf audience has historically comprised a segment of the population which might be expected to disapprove, I applaud the production for including a gay central character, along with an ensemble of seemingly pansexual characters who frequently shift between male/female, female/female, and male/male pairings in various scenes.
Having read about the staging and visual effects in the original production, I was a bit disappointed that certain elements were scaled back or eliminated for New York. However, if you aren't aware of how these things were done previously, you will likely be quite pleased by the set design and its clever functionality (we particularly liked how Falco Tower was designed to suggest the fret board of a guitar).
If I wanted to be nit-picky, I might complain that act two is slightly padded (one or two songs felt redundant, plot-wise, and the pacing would be better if they were cut), the ostensible leads (Mr. Polec and Ms. Bennington) are at times overshadowed by the tremendous vocal power of Mr. Dean and Ms. Hall, and I would've used "Read 'Em and Weep" in place of "What Part of My Body Hurts the Most".
All of this aside, what makes Bat Out of Hell such a hell of a ride is the cast. Every one of them is 100% committed to what they're doing, and the vocal talent is at times downright astounding. Never - and I say this without hyperbole - never on a New York stage have I heard a more powerful vocal performance than that of Mr. Dean and Ms. Hall at the end of "It's All Coming Back to Me Now". Unfortunately, this scene also stands as a perfect example of my grievance noted above. It is brilliantly staged to draw parallels between the evolution of both the Strat/Raven and Falco/Sloane relationships, but when literally presented side-by-side, the voices of Polec and Bennington pale in the shadow of Dean and Hall. When the older couple deliver the final "...all coming back to me NOW" line, they hit and sustain that last note with such amazing power that one can only marvel that such a thing is humanly possible.
==> this board is a nest of vipers <==
"Michael Riedel...The Perez Hilton of the New York Theatre scene"
- Craig Hepworth, What's On Stage
Updated On: 8/13/19 at 09:36 AM