Bonnie & Clyde -- 1st Preview Today- Page 13

[PopAria]

Posted: 11/18/11 at 2:05am

It's a scene where Bonnie reads some poetry and then she sings after Clyde asked her to. Then they have hot steamy sex. Jk

Like Bwaydevil said, the song is played on the radio in act two and they all dance and sing to it.

[ArtMan]

Posted: 11/18/11 at 8:32am

As far as rush goes. I rushed last Sunday, November 13. I got there at 9:00 and was fourth in line. I was not that concerned since I was seeing the evening performance. There were multiple people I met in line who had already seen the show eight times. Two girls I met, saw both performances on that Sunday. The rush tickets, that day, were the boxes or the extreme sides. I was told to pick the right side. I ended up moving back and centered, before the performance started. Overall, my favorite show of the five I saw. Lucked out with Laura, who missed the matinee, but was in that evening.

[sorano916]

Posted: 11/18/11 at 9:27am

Lucked out with Laura, who missed the matinee, but was in that evening.

How was Cassie as Bonnie? The chemistry between Laura & Jeremy is wonderful so I'm curious how it was with Cassie as well as her singing.

[dreaming]

Posted: 11/18/11 at 4:49pm

Regarding the rush-Is it cash only or can one use a credit card? (Just want to know if I need to bring cash.)

[Fosse76]

Posted: 11/18/11 at 5:06pm

"How was Cassie as Bonnie? The chemistry between Laura & Jeremy is wonderful so I'm curious how it was with Cassie as well as her singing."

She did fine. Bonnie, like a great many female roles (Disney shows, Christine in Phantom) is so generically written anyone can play it if they have a good enough voice. It's the Clyde role that will make or break the show.

[Blockhead24]

Posted: 11/18/11 at 5:58pm

in case anyone cares, Jeremy will be out January 6-8 for the Joyful Noise opening

[NYTheatre01]

Posted: 11/19/11 at 4:40pm

Jeremy Jordan is going to be one busy young man! Quite the talent!

[kadu335]

Posted: 11/19/11 at 5:46pm

Just came back from today's matinee. I'm actually really surprised. Even with all the good reviews in here, I wasn't expecting to like it as much as I did. I wasn't amazing, but It was a pretty solid show!

I liked most of the songs (apart from a few ones, like the ones performed by the preacher). Jeremy is a star. He was made for this role. Laura was also really great... She got the biggest ovation after doing 'Dying Ain't So Bad'. Now, let me talk about Melissa (I forgot her last name, sorry): She was AMAZING! I started thinking she would be some sort of comic relief I wouldn't really care about and she ended up being so much more than that. I Really liked her a lot. I hope she can get some Tony love next year.

Other than that, I also liked the set design and the projections they used. I though they really added some great value to the play. The book was also nice, but I feel like they could lose the whole 'police officer in love with Bonnie' plot... I didn't care for that storyline at all and the actor seemed so lifeless in his scenes (I don't know if that was intended, it just didn't work for me).

Overall, I did have a really good time. I'm glad went to see it.

[kadu335]

Posted: 11/19/11 at 5:46pm

Double post. Sorry... =S

Updated On: 11/19/11 at 05:46 PM

[CurtainPullDowner]

Posted: 11/19/11 at 8:50pm

From reading these posts it seems to me, very few people have seen the brilliant Athur Penn movie. I also think comparisons with the movie will come into more play when the real reviews come in. One thing that was questioned in the film was the romanticising of the story of two two-bit robbers turned serial killers. Seeing as this is a Musical, I'm sure that point will also be addressed.
A few have been suprised that Blanche isn't a one note stock comedy character, again, watch the film; Parson's Blanche is the most interesting portrait (and pretty much steals the film).
A lot of Osnes and Jordan's praise is how hot they are, not much about their character development. (those who have seen it could elaborate).
One of the great stories of this season will be if a Wildhorn musical is a hit, the man who may have written more flops on Bway than any other composer finally getting it right is against all odds. If you were a betting person you would have to bet on another flop. The show seems to have little advance (plenty of tkts for most perfs on tdf), with no star names it's gonna be an uphill battle, but nevertheless an interesting one.

[sorano916]

Posted: 11/19/11 at 10:27pm

I honestly think if people came into the show expecting it to be like the movie, then they're doing a lot of disservice to themselves and the show. It's two separate things and the public (and the critics) should treat it as that.

The reason why people seem surprised that Blanche in the musical isn't a comedy character is because, I think, of her first scene; it's a bit comedic. However, as the musical graduates, you see the heart of the character and Melissa does a wonderful job bringing substance to it.

As far as Osnes & Jordan... Jordan's Clyde has a been character development than Osnes' Bonnie, especially from when he gets beaten up in prison to when he kills for the first time.

The show is getting pretty decent word-of-mouth. I don't think it'll be a flop nor do I think it'll be the next BOM.

[SporkGoddess]

Posted: 11/19/11 at 10:47pm

Again, the portrayal of Blanche in the movie is very different from what she was like in real life. So even if you go in having seen the movie, it's probably going to be different.

[CurtainPullDowner]

Posted: 11/19/11 at 11:10pm

If you have seen the movie and are a fan of it, it will be impossible to completely seperate the two. Without the movie, B&C would have remained minor characters in US history and the musical would probably never exist.
As far as Blanche goes, I'm sure the musical takes as many, if different, librties with the real woman (as with all the characters). But the point of how she is introduced makes sense.
In the movie Blanche starts out meek and mousey, and then she grows, every which way, untill that harrowing scene in the hospital. I look forward to seeing Melissa's take, she's a major talent.

[shrekster224]

Posted: 11/19/11 at 11:38pm

Can't wait to see this show. Sounds interesting.

Just cuz I might be there during the dates, which u/s is covering for Jeremy during the Joyful Noise opening?

[sorano916]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 12:39am

If you have seen the movie and are a fan of it, it will be impossible to completely seperate the two. Without the movie, B&C would have remained minor characters in US history and the musical would probably never exist.

Yes, I understand that, but at a certain point in the musical, even the fans of the films should just disregard notions of the film and take the musical for how it portrays the story of Bonnie & Clyde. Many shows have a film counterpart and critics (and audiences) have been able to separate the two so why would/could it be any different with "Bonnie & Clyde"?

[CurtainPullDowner]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 1:18am

Well, for one, repeating myself, before the '67 movie only a handfull of people knew who B&C were(there was no google) and it is the only reference theatregoers 1n 2011 have to them.
And look at Clyde's t-shirt and hat and Bonnie's fashionable outfits and you see references to the movie.
I think the creator's are honestly trying to imagine this as an entirely different animal from the film, but that will be difficult.
Sorano, you are right, the aim is to go in with a clear head and see the work stand on it's own, but that's easier said than done.
Most times I wish I could do that.
I'm a big fan of Osnes, only saw Jordan in NEWSIES (not as impressed as the masses), but he is easy on the eyes and ears, casting too sexy young people is what the movie did and being repeated here.
The real B&C must be smiling in their killer graves as the most attractive robbers, instead of a short normal lookin' ex-con, prison bitch, hot head and a easy girl who owned two dresses and stringy hair under that dirty beret.
Updated On: 11/20/11 at 01:18 AM

[PopAria]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 10:46am

So I guess what you're trying to say is that you see the movie as THE OFFICIAL story of B&C?

I don't think anyone born after 1978 will care about that.

I really feel like the creators have made this musical an excellent work for contemporary theatre. The characters come from dirt! their families stand in bread lines, they're not glamorized that much.


Also, I read a few reviews on other websites and it seems like the only negative thing people have to say is that there's no choreography. No flashy tap numbers or jumping around...
I was thinking the same thing after the first preview, but then I thought, why should I care? Can't there be a musical on broadway that doesn't have dancing on the walls and dancing all over the place? this musical isn't about jazz hands and tap. I mean, everyone dies at the end.... lol

[2]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 11:41am

I saw this yesterday and I thought it was fantastic! Laura and Jeremy have amazing chemistry and their talent shone whether they were together or apart. The book is very strong; I adore everything about Clyde's monologue about what it feels like to kill a man. I actually liked the first preacher's song, but the "Made in America" one was kinda stupid. It took me until the middle of the song to realize what they were trying to say with it and even then I was like "...Oh." Idk I think they could have conveyed that desperate times can make murders look like heroes in a better way.
Speaking of songs I didn't like: "You Love Who You Love" and "Dyin' Ain't So Bad" had me rolling my eyes because they sounded like 90's adult contemporary pop songs. "Too Late To Turn Back Now" also irked me but idk why. "How 'Bout a Dance", "Raise a Little Hell" and "That's What You Call a Dream" were my favorites, though, and "Picture Show" is still stuck in my head.
I wasn't annoyed by the character of Ted (the policeman) but I do wonder if he was necessary. I'm not very familiar with the particulars of the history of B&C (and apparently what I did know-- that Clyde was bisexual-- is wrong), so idk if his character was based on a real person. If he isn't, they probably could have done without and put more focus on her mother.
Oh, and Melissa Van Der Schyff has a lock on a Tony nom, no question.

[CurtainPullDowner]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 1:42pm

I'm not saying the film is the "official" story. After seeing it I got a little obsessed and read all I could find. A few newspaper articles, photographs, Bonnie's scribbling poetry and several interviews that all contridict each other. Whoever interprets it into art does it their own way, I'm down with that.
My point is the musical will have to impress enough for people to not reference the film. This isn't THE WEDDING SINGER. (which unlike B&C did try to recreate the film.
When Wildhorn tells a serious story with POP tunes, he can really screw up (DRACULA), he seems to lack the irony or insight to delve into the characters and turns out a number like THIS IS THE MOMENT, which ain't a bad tune, but throws the show into camp. Most posters are agreeing that his work is better on B&C, but better Wildhorn is usually still third rate comppared to more sophisticated composers. IMO, and I like some of his work.

[broadwaydevil]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 1:54pm

You sure seem to have a lot to critique without seeing the show. Not saying you aren't entitled to an opinion but in my experience, it's impossible to have such sharp views of a show without ever seeing it.

I hope you have a chance to catch B&C and I'd be interested to hear your thoughts.

[CurtainPullDowner]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 2:18pm

I'm seeing the show this week. I tried to keep my posts about the marketing, and media about the show rather than it's content, which I only know from clips, articles and interviews.
And the social significance of B&C.
I'll try to shut up till I see it....!!!

[broadwaydevil]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 2:41pm

Sounds good...please post here after you see it! Interested to hear your thoughts.

[Mister Matt]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 2:53pm

When Wildhorn tells a serious story with POP tunes, he can really screw up (DRACULA), he seems to lack the irony or insight to delve into the characters and turns out a number like THIS IS THE MOMENT, which ain't a bad tune, but throws the show into camp.

Yet he has written some tunes that do delve into the characters quite deeply and effectively. I think songs like When I Look at You, Sympathy Tenderness, In His Eyes, No One Knows Who I Am, Only Love, Storybook, Now When the Rain Falls, Tell My Father, Snow Falls, Dyin' Ain't So Bad, Why Do People Fall in Love, and Where Are You Now do display a level of sophistication far above what could be described as "third rate", though that bar is set only at the level of one's own opinion and expectations for any song.

[MeggilyWeggily08]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 6:29pm

The first time I saw the show I wasn't really floored by it. Decided to go again, since I did enjoy myself the first time, and even though it didn't seem like that much had changed, it's charm really started to come through. I loved it, and I'm actually looking forward to going back. The songs are always stuck in my head, especially Dying Ain't So Bad, and When I Drive. Jeremy and Laura produce absolute magic together, but I also developed a great admiration for Melissa and Claybourne in their roles. This show definitely surprised me, but I'm glad it did.

[GatorNY]

Posted: 11/20/11 at 8:27pm

I went to the matinee today. I wanted to liked it more. Great performances from the leads and featured actors. I thought that the first act dragged. I wanted to be compelled...and by the end of the first act, I was. The second act was much more compelling. It's true that Laura and Jeremy have AMAZING chemistry. My partner said several times that he wished that is was "darker" and that it did not try to be funny. I'm sure that I will go back again, because the performances by the leads are just SO GOOD. I hope it does well, but I am concerned that it won't find and audience.