Well, I'm besotted with the reported updates, as itemized by NYadGal. These types of changes explain why Sorkin was hired -- if they wanted a sweet and funny romantic polish, Harvey Fierstein would've been the choice -- and it sounds like these textual revisions are both consistent with original intentions yet appropriately postmillennial in the best sense. This was always a tale tethered to timeless issues of power, privilege, and yes, gender. Rather than pretend otherwise, it sounds like Sorkin earned his fees by giving us a fresh yet respectful prism. Losing the puffs of smoke and lightning bolts that belong in Wicked won't bother me. The Arthurian legend has always served as a Rorschach Test befitting its eras (see Kennedy Dynasty), and why not an iteration that addresses all that we now know about earned vs entitled hegemony and the struggle to introduce democratic ideals? I'm twice as excited to see it.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling
Updated On: 3/11/23 at 11:02 AM