"Billy messes up big-time, and gets a second chance to redeem himself.
But he doesn't! That's why this all makes no sense to me."
I really agree with this point, and that bothered me at first, but then after thinking about it some more over the next few days, I decided that the musical was much more true to life than if he had redeemed himself. He can make himself visible to his loved ones if he chooses, but he doesn't do that at the end - they basically get the messages they need to hear either from the graduation speaker (in the case of Louise) or from within (in the case of Julie). And in the end, I think that is more true to life. The people who hurt us and then die or leave us don't come back to give us closure by apologizing and telling us that they loved us. We have to give ourselves that closure by realizing that the world "belongs just as much to [us] as to the next person" (as the graduation speaker says, with Louise's keen interest), or by "knowing" that they loved us, as Julie decides to do, despite their severe flaws, including even violence.
**************Matilda spoiler below*****************
I think what bothered me so much about Matilda's ending, even though I liked the show overall, is that the child is lucky enough for her parents to give their blessing to her going to live with a loving guardian, whereas that is a rare stroke of luck that doesn't tend to happen in real life, so it has no message of hope for kids in Matilda's situation who aren't so lucky. It is just a happy and lucky ending for Matilda, which is nice, but that ending depends on outside luck. Matilda's only actions to "make things right" were to sabotage her parents in retaliation, which did not itself lead to her freedom in the end. I wanted it to give more hope to other children in her situation.
***************end Matilda spoiler******************
In Carousel, on the other hand, you don't have Louise's father coming back from the grave to teach her to overcome his hurtful legacy in a literal way (yes, the character is there next to her whispering to her, but she can't hear him in the context of the story - she "hears" his message coming from the graduation speaker, and it is only symbolically emphasized from Billy himself). So, she has to work that lesson out for herself by listening to it from people around her and figuring it out herself, much like in real life.
As for Julie, as i mentioned in an earlier post, it is unfortunately (!) not just a period problem that women and men stay with violent partners. The key to it in the show, and in most cases in real life as well, as that the violent person doesn't lead with violent jerkiness in the beginning of the relationship. If they did, they would never form a bond with the soon-to-be-battered spouse in the first place - the person would just walk away immediately. In most cases in real life as well as in Carousel, you first see the person fall in love with someone who is gentle and kind to her, and after they have married, he hits her in a bout of anger (one time, which they emphasize in the show, but it is early in their marriage and we now know that such things usually escalate rather than getting better). But someone who doesn't know that things can get better if she leaves and doesn't feel that she deserves better, and who sees the husband struggling and makes excuses for him such as his unhappiness and frustration due to unemployment, might think that it would turn around once that period of frustration is over.
When someone starts out gentle and kind and then changes to more jerky behavior, people sometimes look for external reasons for the change and assume that it is out of their character the first or second time it happens, and not unless it becomes the new normal do they realize that it was within them all along. That is why so many spouses stay with someone who has hit them - it is always followed by remorse and renewed kindness. If it weren't, making the decision to leave would be much easier. (Yes, I know it should be easy even after one incident, but that is not always the reality for everyone, and it doesn't mean that they "deserve" what they get with the violent spouse - they might need help seeing that they should leave.)
It is not an admirable trait that Julie stays with Billy and i don't think that the show portrays it as such (witness Julie's agreeing with Carrie that she is better off after Billy dies). But it is realistic for a certain segment of the population, and not a small one, whose stories are so rarely told. Billy is pretty much legitimately identified as a failure by the heaven-guide character. But what happens to his loved ones afterward is the real point of the story (at least for me), and not so much what happens to him. In other words, the story is a tragedy about a very flawed character, Billy, who affects the lives of Julie and Louise and it is about how they move on to better lives afterward. When well-acted, it also is easy to see how Billy's good qualities (being kind to Julie at first, wanting to provide for his child, however mis-guided the method) could have attracted her in the first place and thus started the sad story going.
Musical theatre has lots of telling the stories of happy, confident people falling in love. It doesn't have lots of stories about deeply flawed people falling in love, messing things up, hurting their kids, but then giving their kids hope for a better life because they can overcome their parents' hurtful legacy and don't have to be limited by it. That story resonates with a lot of people in a way that is rare in musical theatre. I think that is why Carousel is so loved by a great many people.
Updated On: 4/28/13 at 11:08 PM