#76
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:07pm
So I guess I was supposed to join the board, wait six months and THEN post my review, which, again, was not negative?
Clay Aiken as Joseph — Page 4
#77
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:08pm
And you are a troll who only shows up to support Clay, no matter what.
Lol
Lol
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
#78
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:11pm
So I guess I was supposed to join the board, wait six months and THEN post my review, which, again, was not negative?
----------------------
He can't sing, can't act, stands around awkwardly, isn't believable, has no emotional connection to the songs and oh yes, Anthony Federov did it better. But it wasn't negative your honor. Really it wasn't.
----------------------
He can't sing, can't act, stands around awkwardly, isn't believable, has no emotional connection to the songs and oh yes, Anthony Federov did it better. But it wasn't negative your honor. Really it wasn't.
#79
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:13pm
I didn't say he can't sing (in fact I said he sings well, despite the falsetto stuff), and I didn't say he can't act. He did stand around awkwardly more than once throughout the show, and he was completely void of emotional connection throughout most of the show.
Also, YOU are the one who keeps mentioning Anthony Fedorov. I mentioned his name once, and you jumped on it. Anthony does not need my defense. He's plenty successful all on his own. Feel free to look up his band. If I had wanted to post and promote him, I would have.
Also, YOU are the one who keeps mentioning Anthony Fedorov. I mentioned his name once, and you jumped on it. Anthony does not need my defense. He's plenty successful all on his own. Feel free to look up his band. If I had wanted to post and promote him, I would have.
Updated On: 8/4/13 at 10:13 PM
#80
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:16pm
I suppose if I mention the names Donny Osmond or Max Von Essen I'll be a rabid fan of them too?
#81
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:16pm
#82
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:18pm
dblue, why do you even bother defending yourself to this cudgel?
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
#83
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:19pm
Uh, I never posted ANYTHING in the other Clay as Joseph thread, or anywhere else, for that matter.
LMAO... started a new account. That's hilarious.
LMAO... started a new account. That's hilarious.
Updated On: 8/4/13 at 10:19 PM
#84
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:20pm
Jane2, I'm not so much defending myself as amusing myself. :-P
#85
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:20pm
What the fack is a cudgel and what decade are you from?
#86
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:22pm
Well, it's been fun, but as I have a life and things to do tomorrow, I must head off to bed. As I said before, a review is only one person's opinion. If you're completely driven to believe I'm wrong, by all means, see the show yourself and write your own review.
#87
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:24pm
Riiiiggghhht and you didn't post this picture of your true love either.
#88
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:26pm
Mikers -- you sound like a child. Over and over and over again.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
#89
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:28pm
Is anyone going to answer my question, or is this going to be a Mikers melt down thread?
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
#90
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:29pm
"What the fack is a cudgel and what decade are you from?"
A cudgel is a short thick stick (It's the same in any decade, son)
A cudgel is a short thick stick (It's the same in any decade, son)
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES
#91
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:29pm
Mikers, that picture was posted by CATSNYrevival
But why do you keep promoting Anthony ? Are you his publicist ?
But why do you keep promoting Anthony ? Are you his publicist ?
#92
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:30pm
You're right, I didn't post that picture. I've seen it before, though. I'd say thanks for the promotion of a great artist, but like I said before, he's moved on to other things and no longer needs it.
#93
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:43pm
Diva, it was supposed to be a copro with the Fulton Theatre, but the two split up shortly before auditions were held. I don't think the casting of Clay was the reason (that happened well after they made the decision to do the productions on their own).
#94
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:55pm
Saw Joseph many years ago with Donny Osmond as Joseph and we all really enjoyed it. Can't imagine those lovely ballads sang in a high register. How does his voice contrast with the children's voices?
#95
Posted: 8/4/13 at 10:57pm
That was actually something I meant to mention in my review and forgot about- the children were actually very downplayed in this production, in my opinion. Only a handful of them were wearing mics, so they were barely audible sometimes. And they were always off in the background onstage. They seemed to get much less focus than the productions I've seen in the past, both live and on video.
#97
Posted: 8/4/13 at 11:11pm
You're welcome!
On the whole it's not a bad production. I don't feel as though my time was wasted. I just thought some of the choices were strange, and some of the performances were not as strong as they could have been. There were plenty of positives to make up for it. For the most part, it was enjoyable.
On the whole it's not a bad production. I don't feel as though my time was wasted. I just thought some of the choices were strange, and some of the performances were not as strong as they could have been. There were plenty of positives to make up for it. For the most part, it was enjoyable.
#98
Posted: 8/4/13 at 11:29pm
Wow, Mikers is obviously a member of Claymatology! Once you are in that cult it is VERY difficult to get out!
Those Blocked: SueStorm. N2N Nate. Good riddence to stupid! Rad-Z, shill begone!
#99
Posted: 8/5/13 at 1:02am
A true Claymate meltdown. Get out the KY Jelly and let's have some fun.
Updated On: 8/5/13 at 01:02 AM
#100
Posted: 8/5/13 at 6:56am
Does the meltdown alert chart have a specific color for claymates? I vote for "highly saturated ginger"
Art has a double face, of expression and illusion.
Tickets From $59
Tickets From $71
Tickets From $71
Tickets From $95