_john said: "He did point out, however, that you wouldn't want to miss Sam Clemmett as Albus or Anthony Boyle as Scorpius."
This, in my opinion, is largely due to the fact that there is so much content to go off of as Harry. So while Jamie Parker literally IS Harry Potter to me ever since seeing him, he wasn't the original Harry Potter.
Whereas in many ways Sam and Anthony are Albus and Scorpius. When playing Harry, everything is already there. Years and years of backstory. But with Scorpius and Albus, it's largely just the script, not even a full chapter of epilogue, and then the rest is all their own.
I feel like with understudies it's a bit different because I reckon they kind of try to emulate the original chemisty, but I'm so excited/nervous/upset/mixed emotions for cast change because I feel as though with a cast change, the characters themselves could be vastly different. Especially Albus who, imo, is largely an internally driven character. His motives really could differ so greatly depending on line delivery. Same with Scorpius, but imo to a lesser extent.
I do agree with most people that Anthony is absolutely a standout - maybe even more than most, because he was the exact opposite of what I had envisioned and yet my disappointment was washed away almost immediately due to just how simply fantastic he was.
But poor Sam just doesn't get enough credit. A lot of Albus was a creation, imo, of his own. And while I can't speak too much as I haven't seen anyone else play the part, I feel as though his presence might not have been detected due to emulation, not necessarily that he himself doesn't bring anything special to the role.
Updated On: 9/24/18 at 11:27 PM