HOrk said, "You folks are getting crazy here. I'm sorry, but I don't have sympathy for someone who can't get a lead role in a Broadway show because they're not white. I just don't. I hate the term "first world problem," but that is such a first world problem. Actors get turned down for all kinds of reasons. They're always either too short, too tall, too fat, too skinny, too old, too young. Nobody has a problem with that, but "too dark," that's outrageous! When are we going to have a fat Glinda? Never. Because that's not the character. I'm sorry if you're not a pretty, young, thin, white woman and don't get to play Glinda on Broadway, but that's just tough sh!t. It's the nature of the business."
I agree with your entire post on this although I only quoted part. My question to everyone on this topic is - when going all out color blind in roles that are specific in race, gender, size, age, etc., don't you think you may be - well, without using the word "ruining" I'll say confusing, throwing off, the audience? I repeat I'm only referring to very specific roles which make the most artistic sense the way they are written. What is so horrible about casting them that way? Like for instance, having "Old Man River" sang by a white slave.
p.s. I hate when someone uses the faux word "anyways."
<-----I'M TOTES ROLLING MY EYES