FINDING NEVERLAND Previews — Page 5
Posted: 3/17/15 at 1:14pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 2:58pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 3:05pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 3:11pm
Ultimately, the score and book are just not good. You can try to dress it up with a magic trick here and a big dance number there - but it's still not a well written show. The scores reminds of Ghost and Wonderland. Some pleasing, generic pop songs that could be interchangeable with many other shows.
The good! Some pretty visuals and lots of the cast is winning. Matthew Morrison is talented and charismatic- but there is a major accent problem that I expect will improve. I also suspect his singing is not on par with Jeremy Jordan's. I didn't see JJ but I've heard him sing a couple of the big songs from the show and MM doesn't offer the vocal excitement that JJ did. Laura MK did though - she sounded great..
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 03:11 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 3:12pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 5:21pm
(Granted, I haven't seen the changes yet, but there was something that beautifully tugged at my heartstrings in Cambridge. No, it wasn't perfect, but I warm to anything that takes my breath away and warms my heart.)
Posted: 3/17/15 at 5:27pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 5:29pm
Yes, Philly. I saw Honeymoon and mostly enjoyed it.
Posted: 3/17/15 at 5:36pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 9:25pm
Updated On: 3/18/15 at 09:25 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:07pm

So I'm curious, is this particular scene still in the show?
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:20pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:38pm
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:50pm
I can vouch for the fact that they were changing things in Cambridge as well. In fact, from what I've read, seen and....uh....heard, they've definitely revamped this show substantially since then.
Heck, I saw Porgy & Bess, also directed by Paulus, in Cambridge and by the time it got to Broadway, changes had been made to be sure.
Posted: 3/17/15 at 10:59pm
Updated On: 3/17/15 at 10:59 PM
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:32pm
That being said, I went into the show tonight with completely fresh eyes, excited to see the result of what I heard was a lot of work.
And a lot of work it was.
The opening of the show is completely different. In Boston I remember it being this weird song about clocks and time, a theme that wasn't really mentioned much throughout the rest of the show. Now, we are introduced to James and Frohman quickly and the show moves at a brisk pace from there.
I'm happy to see that Mary's furniture song has been cut, as have the constantly dancing maids and butlers. The song seemed completely out of place and the dancing servants stole focus every scene they were in. The downside is that Mary now has almost no character development whatsoever aside from being mildly shrill and pretty rude to her dinner guests. Regardless, Teal Wicks sounds good with the little she has to sing--the score certainly suits her better than it suited Jeanna de Waal--and she looks beautiful in the costumes.
Matthew Morrison is a little more reserved than I remember Jeremy being, his playfulness seems to be more verbal than in action. He's not as jumpy or physical, but he has a really sweet rapport with all the boys, especially Aidan Gemme as Peter. Even though the keys have been lowered, I don't think it has made the score any less exciting. The act one closer, "Stronger" still soars and ends with a pretty thrilling staging moment. The chemistry between Laura and Matthew is there, though, probably could be stronger. It also doesn't hurt that Morrison has really never looked better.
Kelsey is good, funny, a little hammy. I didn't enjoy McGrath's performance in Cambridge at all, so I saw Grammer as a pretty vast improvement across the board. It seemed pretty obvious to me that a number of the book scenes were tailored around his specific sense of humor, and there's also a pretty unnecessary and totally anachronistic Cheers reference. His singing is passable, but the audience really just ate up everything he did.
The real standout for me, just as she was in Boston, is Laura Michelle Kelly. She is the beating heart and soul of this show, instantly likable, possibly the warmest and most welcoming stage presence of anyone I've ever seen onstage, and a voice that fills the Lunt Fontanne and brings the house down. Though she is the female lead, I feel like we're sort of short-changed some scenes of just Sylvia and her boys, without the grandmother or James being involved. Still, she all but steals the first act with her song, and her ****SPOILER**************
death scene is truly one of the most beautiful things I have ever seen onstage, though, I just wish she would fly out the window at the close of the scene.
****END SPOILER*************
I think the biggest issue for me is the score. The songs are fun, they're entertaining and a number of them are quite catchy, but I feel like they work so against the story of the show. Quite a few of them are just beautiful pop songs sung by incredible voices, others certainly do further the plot. But at the end of the day, I just don't feel pop music is what this show needs. And a times, I think the music gets in the way of what could be very touching moments. However, the audience around me seemed thrilled by every song and each number got a pretty rousing ovation. It really is a crowd pleaser.
The book, tonally, seems all over the place. In the middle of what should be a heartwarming scene where the cast of Peter Pan performs the show for Sylvia in the nursery while her son narrates, we have jokes about the kids receiving royalties and Frohman intruding on the Captain Hook scene. If these little moments were cut, I think the entire ending would carry a little bit more emotional weight and depth.
The staging is pretty by the books, with the exception of the act one finale and Sylvia's final scene. I was pretty glad to see the ensemble was cut from "We're All Made of Stars" and it is instead just the four boys making instruments out of household objects and singing. It seems more genuine and sweet than the huge ensemble number it was in Cambridge. The only number I found to be ridiculous was "Circus in Your Mind." The song itself is what it is, not great, not terrible, not totally necessary. The staging of the dance break in the middle is insane bordering on camp, with projections of clocks, gears, and merry-go-rounds; the return of the dreaded clock tophats from the opening number in Cambridge, it just seemed completely absurd and out of sync with the rest of the show.
All in all, I did enjoy what I saw tonight. I know I'm not a very "seasoned" member here, but I do see a lot of what opens and while I don't think I would HEARTILY recommend Finding Neverland, I did find quite a bit to like. It's worlds better than what I saw in Boston, and I think they're in a good launching off point to make more changes and end up with a strong, enjoyable, and meaning family show.They've got the base materials, a very game cast--I cannot stress enough how wonderful LMK is--and weeks to tweak and work on it. I just hope they get the work done, I look forward to seeing the show again is it evolves throughout previews.
Posted: 3/17/15 at 11:33pm
Witless, generic, non-atmospheric score. Script is a groaner.
Actors try hard, but....this is gonna be uphill sledding with the critics.
Posted: 3/18/15 at 12:10am
"Hey little girls, look at all the men in shiny shirts and no wives!" - Jackie Hoffman, Xanadu, 19 Feb 2008
Posted: 3/18/15 at 12:15am
Posted: 3/18/15 at 12:27am
Posted: 3/18/15 at 12:44am
Posted: 3/18/15 at 1:11am
Posted: 3/18/15 at 1:16am
Posted: 3/18/15 at 5:39am
BroadwayWorld TV