^I think that's an incredibly accurate statement, Bettyboy.
It really is a matter of expectation. Chorus Line made no apology for having no intermission. If you had to get up during it, you got up, but you didn't ever expect there to be an intermission. When you sat down to that show, no big announcement was made, the show just started and ended with no intermission. At least that's the way it's been all the times I've seen it.
With this production of Follies, even when there is no intermission, it is still listed in the playbill, so there are signs up saying there's no intermission, and the ushers mention it every four seconds. People then start to think about the fact that there's no intermission and work themselves up to having to leave and want there to be one.
The people who saw the original production can attest to whether there was the same kind of understanding as with Chorus Line.
ETA: I usually agree with you, Rippedman, but I didn't enjoy the intermission when I had it in DC. I just didn't want to discuss the show until I'd seen Act 2, knowing enough what was to be ahead.
"Art, in itself, is an attempt to bring order out of chaos."-Stephen Sondheim
Updated On: 8/27/11 at 04:44 PM