@Spidernight
YES! Sorry to RANT , but this is exactly my point regarding the line sitters!! Here are the two issues with line sitters:
First, at the end of the day, line-sitting is no different than scalping. In both instances you have third parties taking advantage of Hamilton's popularity to make a personal profit. They're just using tricky semantics and different words to describe the same thing. One calls it a "markup" the other a "sitting fee." But at the end of the day, no matter what you call it, a person who paid $200 in a "markup fee" and a person paying $200 in line-sitting fees are still paying $377 for a $177 ticket and the third party is still walking away with a $200 profit. In fact, if anything, line sitting fees are worse because you still lose money even if you don't get the ticket.
Second, both practices involve screwing over the Average Joes doing things the "right" way. That is, people who stand in line for themselves looking to pay the fair, affordable price. Line sitting gives certain people the opportunity to use their financial privilege to trump the "less fortunate," if you will. They are essentially using money to cheat the system, while stepping on and impairing the rest of the paupers who didn't, or couldn't, hire their own whipping boys.
People will try to say sitting helps those who cannot stand on their own (people with disabilities, elderly, etc.), but this argument is weak and plays you for dumb. A) Line-sitters are clearly NOT a public service aimed at helping such people. They will take whoever is willing to pay as a client. I'd love to see the demographics of their clientele. Bet few fit this segment. B) In fact, the 3 or 4 times I've personally gotten a chance to see the clients who hired the line-standers, they were EACH young, healthy MEN who look like the kinds of guys you would see on Wall Street (others in the forum can attest). C) Despite that, let's say EVERY customer were an elderly woman with a cane, that doesn't change the fact that the selling point for line sitters is NOT that they will stand in your place (because they are so sweet and want women and children and elderly to see the show, too!), but that they are willing to do so at a ridiculously early time to ensure you get a ticket. This only screws over those who stand in the line at normal hours because it isn't their jobs to wake up at 1 or 2 a.m. to stand in line.
What's going to end up happening will be a "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" culture in which people will either try to beat the line sitters in line and push the start time up until people are lining up at midnight or even the night before (just wait until the summer), or everyone starts trying to hire line-sitters, thus encouraging this second market that uses the Richard Rodgers fairly priced tickets as a commodity they will use to fill their own pockets.
Updated On: 2/22/16 at 02:18 AM