#126
Posted: 2/24/06 at 3:29pm
I loved the ending to the film. The shot of Angel (which, thanks to commentary, I now know came from a test shot) was perfection, in my mind.
I always thought of the opening, with the cast on the stage, as kind of an Overture for the movie, a way of introducing us to the 8 friends. It was a way of them saying "Here is our story." Not to compare it to Shakespeare, because that would be absurd, but I found it to be in the same vein as Romeo & Juliet's prologue. Here's our story.
That being said - when I started watching the alternate ending, I burst into tears at the sight of a spotlight where Angel belonged - I actually started saying "I don't like it!" out loud before I realized I was watching the movie alone. When Angel came out, I sobbed more and was reminded of the stage show, which I enjoyed. I loved that Collins grabs Angel's hand. And I loved that the movie still would have ended with a shot of Angel. Coming full circle was nice, in a way.
But.
I totally agree with the commentary, where it was said (I'm not sure if it was by Columbus or Adam Pascal) that this ending allowed the audience to detach more from the story. Having the movie end on stage and bringing Angel out - it really *is* like when we found out Patrick Duffy was alive, or that St. Elsewhere was really inside a snow globe. This ending would have given the audience a feeling of "Why did I just spend two hours on this?" rather than the lasting impact the released ending does, of hope and love and sorrow. In a way, it would have trivialized the story.
While I thoroughly enjoyed both endings, it is obvious to me that the released ending was the right choice for the film.
I always thought of the opening, with the cast on the stage, as kind of an Overture for the movie, a way of introducing us to the 8 friends. It was a way of them saying "Here is our story." Not to compare it to Shakespeare, because that would be absurd, but I found it to be in the same vein as Romeo & Juliet's prologue. Here's our story.
That being said - when I started watching the alternate ending, I burst into tears at the sight of a spotlight where Angel belonged - I actually started saying "I don't like it!" out loud before I realized I was watching the movie alone. When Angel came out, I sobbed more and was reminded of the stage show, which I enjoyed. I loved that Collins grabs Angel's hand. And I loved that the movie still would have ended with a shot of Angel. Coming full circle was nice, in a way.
But.
I totally agree with the commentary, where it was said (I'm not sure if it was by Columbus or Adam Pascal) that this ending allowed the audience to detach more from the story. Having the movie end on stage and bringing Angel out - it really *is* like when we found out Patrick Duffy was alive, or that St. Elsewhere was really inside a snow globe. This ending would have given the audience a feeling of "Why did I just spend two hours on this?" rather than the lasting impact the released ending does, of hope and love and sorrow. In a way, it would have trivialized the story.
While I thoroughly enjoyed both endings, it is obvious to me that the released ending was the right choice for the film.
"It's not for sissies, contrary to popular belief." - Tommy Tune, on musical theatre.
My avatar: Yummy, no?
My avatar: Yummy, no?