#26
Posted: 7/26/09 at 7:54pm
"my basis is the consistency of her absences as reported by others".
Your basis for what? Labeling her as unprofessional? You still don't have any facts to support that. All you have for facts is that she's had a lot of absences. Anyone who saw her accept her award at the Tonys could plainly see and hear she was very ill. I don't know if you remember some time back when Laura Benanti had frequent absences, and she was attacked on these boards in much the same way. Later it was disclosed that she had a medical problem that the producers would not allow her to talk about. Perhaps there's something of that nature going on. We don't know (that was for emphasis).
As to my not taking you so seriously because of your name, that's an opinion, not an attack. I'd feel the same way if it was I<3ephelba4evr. I'm sure you thought your thread title was clever. I thought it was just silly, misleading, and National Enquirer-ish. Also an opinion. Just like I think it's silly to be so up in arms about a performer being out when you had every reason to believe that it was pretty likely she'd be out. And it's out and out wrong and irresponsible to suggest that a performer go on if she's ill. Obviously, there's an issue, and clearly it needs to be addressed. If she's unable to continue they need to do something about it - but calling her disrespectful to her colleagues and unprofessional when you have no basis in saying so? I take issue with that.
Your basis for what? Labeling her as unprofessional? You still don't have any facts to support that. All you have for facts is that she's had a lot of absences. Anyone who saw her accept her award at the Tonys could plainly see and hear she was very ill. I don't know if you remember some time back when Laura Benanti had frequent absences, and she was attacked on these boards in much the same way. Later it was disclosed that she had a medical problem that the producers would not allow her to talk about. Perhaps there's something of that nature going on. We don't know (that was for emphasis).
As to my not taking you so seriously because of your name, that's an opinion, not an attack. I'd feel the same way if it was I<3ephelba4evr. I'm sure you thought your thread title was clever. I thought it was just silly, misleading, and National Enquirer-ish. Also an opinion. Just like I think it's silly to be so up in arms about a performer being out when you had every reason to believe that it was pretty likely she'd be out. And it's out and out wrong and irresponsible to suggest that a performer go on if she's ill. Obviously, there's an issue, and clearly it needs to be addressed. If she's unable to continue they need to do something about it - but calling her disrespectful to her colleagues and unprofessional when you have no basis in saying so? I take issue with that.