My biggest problem with the "young lovers" in this musical is that they are cardboard cutouts essentially there to sing a lot and fall in love incredibly quickly. Ken and Barbie have as much depth.
I thought both Amanda and Eddie performed admirably considering we know next to nothing about how they're feeling outside of "I love you." We know a lot of Cosette's backstory without hearing much if anything as to how she feels about it or the world or her life or her mother. The fact that Amanda made her seem (almost) human is a credit to her. She was seriously fighting the odds. It's a thin role. Let's start with that before we even get to her thin voice.
And Marius is even worse. All we know is that he's fighting with the rebels (Why? How did he come to join them? What else has be been doing up to that point?) And then he sees Cosette for five seconds, and that's "who he is" for the rest of the story. A horribly dull character, and a huge credit to Redmayne for making something out of (quite literally) nothing.
Empty roles with lots of singing. It's one of the reasons the second half of this musical plot sags so much. It focuses on the young lovers and gives us nothing to learn from them or about them. They just swoon and moon within their own story.
And Eponine's sole purpose in this entire story is to delay Marius from reading Cosette's departure note. She loves him from a distance. That's her entire character.
Good for these actors for at least attempting to "live" inside the shallow roles.
After 50 years, it would be great if we could get beyond "Tuptim and Lun-Tah" as the secondary lovers, and even they had more known about them and going for them (and against them) with less songs and stage/screen time.
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22