I think I should be clearer in my terms/definitions - when I say 'musically brilliant' I'm very much referring to the performances, and when I say performances I'm specifically referring to Nicole S and David Thaxton. And when I say 'performances' I'm referring to the combination of musical timbre, dynamics, acting choices etc. which I think might encompass some of what I assume you mean when you say musical direction. I'm not referring to the writing*.
For me, these two performances are beyond Tony worthy and I don't feel I'm saying this naively - I saw the show about 4 times, 3 times with Nicole, once with Rachel Tucker - I've studied recordings of the show over and over again. And of course I've seen A LOT of Broadway theatre, including all of the greats live (i.e. Bernadette, Patti, Donna, Elaine, Lansbury, Audra, Betty, Marin, Sutton etc.). I'm not just some TikTok fangirl (in fact, I don't even use TikTok, and I don't really know who Nicole S is actually outside of this show lol), nor would I say I'm easily pleased.
So it's hard for me to recognise what your experience is with this production if you don't see it as it's just not my experience at all - I'm hoping when the cast recording comes out it will become clearer. I fully expected the show to go to Broadway after seeing Nicole a couple of times because I just found her absolutely jaw dropping. For me, it's not just poor or average or even good - it's among the best I've ever seen. And it's actually a subtly new sound too. After so many years sick and tired of cookie cutter pop vocals it's refreshing to hear someone bring something actually new in terms of sound. The best analogy I can think of is it's like listening to someone as virtuosic as Whitney Houston take on the role.
As for taking audiences out of the show, well again this is where I'd say your experience of the show does not reflect mine or what I think the Director's intentions are. And if we go specifically into let's call it 'gimmick by gimmick' I think it's clearer that most are not intended to take people out of the show at all. For example if we begin to list a few I remember:
* Nicole looking out at the audience when Joe says they're not all here to see her - I don't think this is intended to take people out of the show. She is being filmed and is on screen - it is meta because it's literally true of the audience AND it's absolutely true that of course Norma (and specifically Nicole's Norma) would have the kind of attitude that Nicole displayed here. It's in service of the character and show.
* Nicole twirking - again given the context of the scene where she is acting out Salome in the most ridiculous/hilarious way it does feel like Nicole's Norma would have actually thought this was good and done this. It's in service of the character and show.
------Now I understand you would take issue with the above because it doesn't feel silent film star and is outside the period but again this is where I'm saying that the only way this production works is if you can kind of suspend disbelief and understand that we are in an abstract world that reflects what a faded silent film star movie star would look and feel like if we applied 21st century sensibilities of celebrity and faded celebrity onto it (along with the subtext of Nicole's actual career from what I understand of it - as mentioned I don't know much about her besides this show though of course I have researched a little now). I promise you this is not meant to take you out of the show - if you can find a way to suspend disbelief it all feels very logically consistent and justified in the context of this kind of world.
* Act two title number - I agree that this very much does take people out of the show and is the one place that it feels gimmicky for the sake of being gimmicky at points. However, this is where I'd say it's benign. Also, the audience eats it up. AND the traditional structure of two act musicals usually have a lighter number opening Act two so nothing feels particularly odd or out of place to me.
* "As if we never said goodbye" clapping - this is a weird one I didn't remember Nicole doing this much earlier in the run but definitely noticed it at the end. But again, like the twirking, the attitude to the audience (also all the other line readings such as 'don't have to worry about money honey', 'now go' etc.) it's all kind of consist with the character. I absolutely believe that Nicole's Norma would be trying to get as much attention and praise as possible like this - and the crazy thing about the song is BECAUSE Nicole IS so amazing we do give it to her. Nicole knows what she is doing is special, Norma knows what she is doing is special, the audience knows what she is doing is special. It's a wild moment and I think it should go down in theatre history.
While ultimately I think the X factor (no pun intended) of Nicole's performance is her vocals - I also am still haunted by some of her line readings. The lines with Mr DeMille before 'As if we never said goodbye' were in particular quite chilling, sad and pathetic. "last time I saw you you were some place terribly gay..we were dancing on at table". I really hear the subtext of her trying to charm her way but the line has this kind of nostalgic, heartbroken quality to it that it might have been the last time she was actually happy lol and the whole scene sets up the song so well.
God, I might just need to see this in NYC again.
* I'm not referring to the writing which I kind of feel it's in the same vein as Carrie for me - the Norma ('Margaret White'
songs, especially the big ones, I do love. But the secondary/ensemble ('High school'
songs I do find difficult to enjoy - I find it to be filler and banal. So yes my mind still wandered occasionally because there is only so much a Director can make this work (and I think the ensemble facial expressions, dancing, lighting and lack of colour DID at least make it work for me) - whereas my previous reaction to the material was far worse (cringing or very bored).
Give me claws and a hunch, just away from this bunch.
Updated On: 2/28/24 at 07:03 AM