^Exactly. The circus tricks are such a huge part of the show, and some of them are pretty intense and tricky. I can't see then compromising some of the incredible stunts he does just to have some name in the role.
Updated On: 4/25/13 at 09:14 PM
With only two swings (who seem to be musical theatre performers as opposed to circus performers), what happens when one of the specialty circus performers is out? Those players are harder to replace than any of the principals, I would think. I'm assuming all of the principals learned their tricks for the show and didn't know how to do them before the production.
The whole cast was wonderful INCLUDING Michael James Thomas. Word from the grapevine is that Brantley is going to pan it. Of course this is here-say from a friend of friend of a critic who heard.... so who knows. If Brantley doesn't like this he should have his head examined. Not to mention permanently replaced. Best revival in many years. It was better than the original. Best thing on Broadway. The Artistic staff of Annie should be tied to chairs and forced to watch this ten times so they can see what a revival can be instead of that dreck they are parading as a revival.
Everyone in the cast was better than the original with the exception of Charlotte D'amboise who was almost as good. Who'd have thought you could improve on Fosse.
Broadway Legend Joined: 8/20/06
BLOOMBERG misses the sex and sensuality of the original.
Andrea Martin’s Swing-a-Long Dazzles in ‘Pippin’
Just read the NBC review. Wow, it reveals of a lot of the special moments and plot points (including the finale!), no? Also, I've never thought of "On the Right Track" as a "graceful second act pas de deux."
From reading various articles about the show during it's run at ART and the lead up to opening, they mentioned some performers had "basic" circus training or backgrounds that led to it--Terrance Mann knew how to juggle and throw knives, Molly Tynes and Bethany Moore both had some aerialist experience, and Patina Miller had some gymnastics experience. I don't think anyone would consider their experience extensive, but it was clearly a benefit to the show.
I think when the time comes, other performers will be able to replace leads, but it may be individuals who have some special hidden talents as well.
The Hollywood Reporter calls it "a modern musical relic polished to a brilliant sheen." Praise for the incorporation of dance and circus work by Snider and Walker--they seem to hit the nail on the head when they talk about how the effects fit the performance like a glove.
The Chicago Tribune has high remarks for Paulus, Snider, Walker, and Snider, as well as for the cast, saying it has freshness and exuberance.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/theater/theaterloop/ct-0425-pippin-broadway-review-20130425,0,2216307.column
Hollywood Reporter
Updated On: 4/25/13 at 09:51 PM
Entertainment Weekly is a rave with an A: http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20364394_20693853,00.html
TheaterMania is a rave: http://www.theatermania.com/new-york-city-theater/reviews/04-2013/pippin_64980.html
The Associated Press is a rave: http://online.wsj.com/article/APfaedcde8df674391ae1edbf18ea9ac33.html
Chicago Tribune is a rave: http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/theater/theaterloop/ct-0425-pippin-broadway-review-20130425,0,2216307.column
Talkin' Broadway is negative (how does Matthew Murray still have a job...?): http://www.talkinbroadway.com/world/Pippin2013.html
Updated On: 4/25/13 at 09:56 PM
Broadway Star Joined: 1/28/04
Villagevoice.com says the show has at least seven "wow" moments. A huge rave.
http://blogs.villagevoice.com/dailymusto/2013/04/pippin_opens_my.php
Man, Murray is a CUNT.
Most emblematic of the whole experience is Patina Miller. Last seen on the Main Stem belting and mugging her way through Sister Act, she has transformed the beguiling Leading Player (created by Ben Vereen) into a demonic manifestation of everything that's wrong with both the universe and Broadway. Astringent and charmless, she robotically prances through her dances, exaggerates every syllable of her barked lines and lyrics as if she's articulating to Oregon, and constantly maintains a maniacal grin that makes it look like her face became paralyzed while she was chomping an apple. One could argue that she's demonstrating the molded-plastic promises of the debauched life Pippin is pursuing, but no good advertisement contains that little likability or that much shellacked artifice.
http://www.talkinbroadway.com/world/Pippin2013.html
Brantley...didn't like it very much. Wow.
NY Times is mixed:
http://theater.nytimes.com/2013/04/26/theater/reviews/pippin-directed-by-diane-paulus-at-the-music-box-theater.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
Updated On: 4/25/13 at 10:06 PM
I really don't understand why Murray is lumped in with the rest of the professional critics. He writes for a little-read website with absolutely zero clout.
NJ Newsroom is positive: http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/movies/pippin-broadway-review-stephen-schwartzs-musical-returns-as-a-cheerful-circus
NY Mag is mixed to positive: http://www.vulture.com/2013/04/theater-review-pippin.html
USA Today is a rave with four out of four stars: http://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2013/04/25/broadway-review-pippin/2106973/
Village Voice is a rave: http://blogs.villagevoice.com/dailymusto/2013/04/pippin_opens_my.php
Updated On: 4/25/13 at 10:10 PM
Swing Joined: 11/23/12
I'm devastated by the Brantley pan. Do you think this will hurt the show? Did he even see the same show we did?
I WEIRDLY understand Brantley's beef with the production. I disagree with him, but I kind of understand the "this production is showy for the sake of being showy" interpretation. I felt that at times, but it didn't really bother me the way it seems to have bothered him. And least he liked Andrea and Rachel. He did NOT care for Patina though.
What is wrong with that Talking Broadway reviewer? He's hating "Pippin" all over. from RC in Austin, Texas
It's hard to call a reviewer wrong, but Brantley is just completely off the mark here. Patina was incredible, and the production itself is fabulous.
Im agreeing with the criticism from most of the mixed reviewers, but I too agree Brantley took it a little far. I did laugh, however, at "Mr. Thomas — who has the face, haircut and voice of a tween-dream boy-band singer — suggests Pippin as Bieber in Wonderland. He’s likable, though, in part because he so often looks overwhelmed, and it’s easy for the audience to empathize." (Brantley, NYT)
Swing Joined: 4/25/13
I'm embarrassed to say that I maxed out my articles and don't have a subscription to the Times. If it's legal, could someone copy and paste it?
It's not legal, but just click "stop" before it's finished loading, and you should be able to freeze the article.
Broadway Legend Joined: 11/8/11
Featured Actor Joined: 5/7/08
I hate to say it, but I agree with Brantley for once. I loved a bunch of things about this show, but they were all accessories to it. The circus stuff just pulled my focus and was usually more interesting than the story itself.
Aside from Andrea Martin's tour de force, which is amazing, the one other moment which I felt melded the two especially well was the scene between Charles and Fastrada with the knives.
Broadway Legend Joined: 10/16/11
I'm really shocked at Brantley's review. Especially about Patina. I swear we saw different shows...
Videos