>> "
Pippin is not a great musical. Fosse managed to mask some of the flaws by distracting from the material with his original staging and now Paulus has done the same in another way."
I wholeheartedly agree. The story that the troupe of actors need to tell is a very poor one. It's a mishmash of historical characters and events that have been overly-simplified and fictionalized in order to illustrate a "moral" that is
completely unrelated, and arbitrarily tacked on to the "real" lives of the historical figures.
The troupe really does have "magic to do". It really will be a "miracle play to play" in the sense that it will take a miracle to make this story interesting to watch.
The success of the plot in
Pippin doesn't rely on the strength of the story, but in how well a bad story is told by its acting troupe. In the case of the Lead Player, it's hard to determine if that character is meant to be "real", or also a fictionalized representation (perhaps of a 'conscience' or 'the Devil') like the play-within-the-play's historical, yet fictionalized characters.
Ultimately, the success of
Pippin as a production relies on how well its director tells a convoluted-story-within-a-convoluted story. I agree that "
Pippin is not a great musical" because its success is based more on the spectacle of its presentation, not the material.
Updated On: 4/26/13 at 07:36 AM