All of these people would only be capable of turning Follies into an expensive and stupid-looking bomb--especially Rob Marshall--the way Ken Russell overinflated The Boyfriend to the point that the material made little or no sense and the spectacle was interesting to no one.
None of them would have the subtlety combined with the musical-comedy know-how to do what Michael Bennett and Hal Prince did with the staging. So please spare me any British, French or Australian directors who don't understand the entertainment tradition that Follies comes out of--or who would take it as an opportunity to critique American imperialism and the hollowness of the American dream.
Jean-Pierre Jeunet would make overstress the fantastical, turning the whole thing into Loveland.
Darren Aronofsky would make the whole thing bleak. We've had bleak Follies: They're no fun, even for the cognoscenti.
I'll wait to see Joe Wright's take on Pan before forming an opinion on whether or not his Follies would be good, but in general, if British directors want to do musicals, they should stick to British musicals. I'm tired of listening to people defend Trevor Nunn's direction of American musicals just because he's Trevor Nunn. he still was stupid about Oklahoma and Night Music. (And don't get me started about the Brit who messed up the Roundabout Follies.
And please don't suggest Bill Condon. I like Bill Condon, but he's only going to **** it up as well.
The only directors who could have done Follies are dead: Stanley Donen, Robert Wise and Chuck Walters.
And confidentially to the poster who said:
Again, very few people who are currently living got to see the original Follies production. It really wouldn't take away from anything. I've been through Brenda Frazier, but I'm still here, baby.
Updated On: 12/2/14 at 08:00 PM