I'm all for a film version of FOLLIES-- it actually seems like a property ideally suited to the screen. Let them use every corner of the theater, much the way BIRDMAN does and does fantastically. I actually think the weaknesses in the book allow room for rich new explorations in the screenplay, new ways to weave flashbacks of their lives 30 years before into the events happening on the stage during the reunion. Look at Ken Russel's THE BOYFRIEND to see how well a feature film can make a cinematic meal of a stage-bound property and make it soar. Look at ANNA KARENINA for a recent breathtaking example that mixed fantasy and choreography and stage magic dazzlingly well.
Speaking of Anna, I'd be thrilled if Joe Wright took on the directing of a FOLLIES, as long as Sarah Greenwood was his designer again.
I think any movie adaptation of Follies is doomed to fail.
We'd be far, far better off if Craig Zadan and Neil Meron did a television version of it in an actual old theater.
They could get any of a number of 50-something performers for the four leads (including Christopher Walken for Buddy) and some old broads for the specialty acts. They could have cameras all over the theater and tape the book scenes in the lobbies and lounges and the pastiche numbers on the stage.
Since they wouldn't have to construct sets, perhaps they could spend the set budget on Loveland, reconstructing Boris Aronson's Loveland designs.
But I worry for what unimaginative ghost effects any film version would feel compelled to create.
I don't know about that PalJoey, there's some creative and imaginative people in Hollywood out there who would do justice to FOLLIES without resorting to live production on television which would be a HUGE disservice to FOLLIES big time.
I'm just thinking of how magical the first moments of the most recent revival were, with the ghosts wandering the theater and that lush score washing over you. That could be very cinematic.
PalJoey, of course your ideas for a Follies movie are best. I think filming in the New Amsterdam would be the best idea because that was were most of the Ziegfeld Follies were. I think they could do a little more than the Loveland designs for the OBC and do someting insanely lavish, because in the script they describe as the most lavish Folly imaginable. They could do something like The Great Ziegfeld with the beyond spectacular sets.
^I agree Loveland needs to be more lavish than Boris' great original sets. Something along the lines of the great musicals of MGM's golden age.
If Rob Marshall does want to go authentic he'd find the perfect dilapidated theater in the country. He DID scout around for places to film CHICAGO before filming began.
Vincent Minnelli, only man to do it (and only in his prime), isn't with us, alas. I'm terrified of it becoming "cinematic" in the worst sense. All those iconic musical numbers, appropriately framed by the proscenium, opened up. One of the thrills of "Loveland" was its startling ability to transform the Winter Garden into a Broadway theater of the past, literally before our eyes (the Marquis couldn't pull that off). The Winter Garden became, the Winter Garden of the 1940s. I don't know how a film will match that special magic, no matter how cleverly it's designed.
"I'm a comedian, but in my spare time, things bother me." Garry Shandling