Sleep No More is AMAZING — Page 29

ColorTheHours048 said: "Sadly, Sleep No More is a shell of what it once was. It now runs 7 days a week, meaning no proper amount of time to maintain the magic of the environments. And 5 years on, it shows. The American producers have let the show take a backseat to the bars and restaurants and events and concert venues, focusing more on "How can we make more money?" and not enough on "How do we keep the experience of this alive?"

I last saw it about a year ago and was so turned off by the throngs of superfans and ignorant drunks and clearly overworked performers that I left about an hour and a half in. And having spoken to cast members - past and present - I've found that the folks who run the show just don't take care of the people who make the work happen every night. Sad, really, because I have very strong, fond memories of seeing it in its hayday. That being said, if you haven't seen it before, go. It is still epic and grand and the performers (despite being overworked) are incredibly dedicated and talented.

"

Thanks for the feedback. I go to NYC about twice a year, and have no idea how I missed this. I was told about it in December, now I want to go. 

It seems it is sold out almost every night, is there any night better than the others? If the actors are overworked, maybe Sunday night  or earlier in the week might be best. 

ColorTheHours048 said: "Well, it's 7 days a week, so there's really no "best time to go" but I would say audiences are probably smaller and better behaved on a Monday or Tuesday."

I'm on left coast, and only saw it once, (prior to the bar, restaurant, etc) and thought it was amazing.

One question, if they are running it 7 days a week, wouldn't the show have to be double cast.  I would think the performers would be working less shows then a traditional 8 show week.

I would have to agree about the superfans.  The two times I stumbled on what was about to be a 1:1 I did feel sorry for the performers.   Personally think they should be taken out.  Get rid of the have and have nots.  For what it's worth, when I saw The Drown Man near the end of it's run, I was following the studio exec around and prior to his 1:1 there was no mass crowding like in SNM.  It was well very done.  Still didn't get picked.  

Update: I've been wanting to return to this for a few months now and see if I still felt exhausted of it (and see if it still felt exhausted). I had a friend at this past Sunday's matinee who said there were still plenty of reservations available, so I bit the bullet and went. I have to eat my hat a little here because the performance I saw was some kind of magical.

The crowd was extremely small, maybe 100+, which made for an easily navigatable space. There's something really powerful about being all alone in that enormous building from time to time. And the cast was on fire! I wandered aimlessly for the full 3 hours, picking up scenes as I stumbled across them and taking my time to really take everything in that I came upon.

Is it as lushly immersive as it once was? No. And probably by necessity. But there is so much in SLEEP NO MORE to admire. The design, the choreography, the in-depth story that I can still dig into after almost 5 years running, the music. It's truly a masterpiece of the immersive theatre genre that will be discussed long after it has closed (whenever that may be).

Thanks for the update. I will certainly get tickets for this in the summer. 

Haven't gone through whole thread to see if this has been mentioned, but the producers of "Then She Fell" have a new experience called "The Grand Paradise" which, if you're into the immersive theater experience, a wonderful evening.  Audience is limited to 60 guests with a cast of 20, so there is no pushing and shoving as with the larger experiences.  I highly recommend this.  I've been three times and plan to go again.

Updated On: 3/3/16 at 01:12 PM

I attended Then She Fell and Sleep No More last week for the first time and was floored by both. I'm especially interested in hearing about how SNM has deteriorated since its opening. I fully intend to go again and again.

perfectlymarvelous said: "The producers are not theater people and care very little about preserving the integrity of the show; their main priority is money, which they were making a lot of without encouraging people to buy drinks in multiple bars before the show. 

I think it's still a really special experience and I don't want to color anyone's feelings about it, but there are some things that happen within the show now that didn't happen earlier on in the run and it's a tough thing to stomach because the design of the space and the show itself really are magical. 

"

Ah, so like, super fans. That totally makes sense. I wish I had caught on to this sooner and could've experienced the collective clueless-ness. 

 

So glad to hear SLEEP NO MORE is still working its magic on newbies this many years into the run. Our last visit (our 3rd) was a year and a half ago-- the show was as extraordinary for me as ever, but three times was definitely a maximum. Knowing where everything was on each floor and what happens in every scene had finally given me all I could get out of the experience. I won't lie-- by the end of the night I was simply stalking the male witch for purely prurient reasons. 

I envy jonlow09 his/her relative virginity.

 

Just wanted to give my input from the show. I saw this Friday night for the first time. For the first hour to an hour and a half, I was walking around saying WTF. Then I figured a few things out and actually had 2-3 one on ones depending how you count them.  Two of them were in front of everyone instead of a private room but still only directed at me. I was intrigued enough to go back on Saturday night and figured things out much more.  Then had 2 more one on ones   

 

Not sure what the show was like when it opened but I can't imagine it was much better.  I found the show very intriguing. Unless you see this show or another one opens, you will never experience anything like it.  My biggest complaint is you have  keep up with characters to fully understand. Oftentimes you have to run.  Otherwise you lose them.  Sometimes other audience members get in the way and walk slowly. So you are either forced to be polite and lose the character or simply push them out of the way and hope it doesn't start a fight.  It's certainly the type of show you either love it or hate it.  In order to love it, you have to put in the effort to understand what's going on. 

Updated On: 7/24/16 at 03:00 PM

blaxx said: " Oh, it was MUCH better believe me. I was there last week and it was so disappointed. Lazy,  messy, all around disappointing.  The original cast was electric, nothing compared to the cast I saw - they looked like it was the only job they could get. No applause in the end and people wondering if that was it. Too bad, nothing at all what it used to be. 

 

 

"

Thats too bad. I saw two different casts on Friday and Saturday night. Both shows I went to started at 11pm.  Both seemed to perform with plenty of energy.  Of course, I never saw the original cast. At the end, it did seem awkward. I don't think most of the audience knew what to do after the ending.  It just ended and everyone exited. 

 

I have been twice: 2012 and 2013. The first time for me was electric. It was unlike anything I've ever experienced. The second time I went back I had 4 one on ones! It was such a personal experience and remains one of if not the best theatrical experience I've ever had. I was considering revisiting the show this December but it sounds like while its exciting for new attendees it just lacks the "it" factor it once had. Sad to hear that, I think I'll just live with the stellar memories instead of a revisit.

Theatreboy49 said: "I have been twice: 2012 and 2013. The first time for me was electric. It was unlike anything I've ever experienced. The second time I went back I had 4 one on ones! It was such a personal experience and remains one of if not the best theatrical experience I've ever had. I was considering revisiting the show this December but it sounds like while its exciting for new attendees it just lacks the "it" factor it once had. Sad to hear that, I think I'll just live with the stellar memories instead of a revisit.

 

"

 

If you are inclined to see it again, I would. Maybe you will think it still has the "it" factor", maybe you think it lost it. I believe it is a matter of perception. For example, on my recent trip, I saw Phantom on Thursday and Chicago on Saturday. I just couldn't get into them. They seemed like old news to me. The audience seemed to thoroughly enjoy them. Although I had my reasons as to why the shows weren't up to par, I do believe it was a matter of perception. However, I did see Les Mis on the same trip and loved it. 

Here is a review from a guy that saw the show with its original cast, and then went back recently. He still believes it has the "it" factor. 

 

http://www.theatermania.com/off-broadway/reviews/sleep-no-more_76214.html