Gav and henrik: firstly, I love you both and love talking about lyrics with you.
Gav, you make an excellent point about where the stanza needs to go, thematically, for Johanna. And, henrik, thank you for pointing out the R&J allusion. I agree that the unsinging lark emphasizes all of those things about Johanna’s situation, much in the same way, as Gav pointed out, that the stanza needs to get to Johanna’s wish to be able to cope.
BUT… don’t her semantics make this an either/or proposition? The lark doesn’t sing for one of two reasons – either because larks do not sing in captivity, full stop, OR because the atmosphere of the house is so oppressive that no songbird will sing there, including larks, which, yes, by the way, are notably songbirds.
The first reason is paramount. If captive larks never sing, then they won’t sing in a dark and oppressive hour or a bright and cheery house. The atmosphere is beside the point. So – and I think, Gav and hen, you both agree to as much – this is the reason her lark’s not singing.
Let’s expand the same logic beyond Sondheim’s beautiful economy. It would be like me saying:
“After Eight never argues with me because he has me blocked. And that thread I started last week was so controversial that
no one argued with me… not even After Eight!”
That would be a weird thing to say, right?
CHURCH DOOR TOUCAN GAY MARKETING PUPPIES MUSICAL THEATER STAPLES PERIOD OIL BITCHY SNARK HOLES
Updated On: 10/2/14 at 08:14 AM