I find it fascinating how everyone is rallying around the critics. I have followed the chat boards since the show went into production in Denver and I have to say that 'chatters' and 'bloggers' have mostly been DYING to crap all over this show. What makes critics any different? I would imagine that many people who post here fancy themselves 'critics'... Are you beyond having a predisposition to not liking Disney or not liking Mermaid? Why do people seem almost cheery to post 9 pages here agreeing with the critics? Is it a good thing if ANY show doesn't do well? Don't we (as theatre lovers) want shows to do well?
Someone said that people are naive to think that critics are anything but completely objective almost angelic figures who are nothing but the arbiters of good theatre taste. Would you feel the same way if Mermaid was your show?
Do critics really represent the general public, the people who buy PS3 boxes, go to wrestling, watch crappy action movies...? I don't think so. Critics continue to judge all commercial theatre as if it is attempting to be high art. I understand wanting to hold musicals to a higher bar but when critics dislike shows like Mamma Mia! (a world juggernaut) are they representative of the masses? NO.
Incidentally, the Washington Post didn't like the Mermaid film any better than the musical. Is it surprising that they didn't like a musical of the film? No.
Updated On: 1/11/08 at 05:12 PM