I saw the sit down production in LA and thought the chandelier was very slow in hitting the stage. It was almost in slo-mo.
"TheatreDiva90016 - another good reason to frequent these boards less."<<>>
“I hesitate to give this line of discussion the validation it so desperately craves by perpetuating it, but the light from logic is getting further and further away with your every successive post.” <<>>
-whatever2
Ive heard the london chandelier falls quickly and then its a blackout and when the light come back up, its already on the stage and its more realistic.This true?
I don't really understand what you mean, but in the Broadway production, the chandelier falls to the stage, the music ends, there is a blackout and the house lights come up and it is laying on the stage. Then at some point during the intermission, it rises back up to the ceiling. Is this what you're thinking of?
I saw POTO on broadway, but from what I heard on the london production, it falls faster and It looks like the cord has been actually cut. This is only what I heard.
The chandelier 'effect' in NYC is like an old, arthritic and doddering grandmother carefully negotiating her way down a flight of stairs. A complete dud.
I saw POTO on tour and the effect was amazing. Maybe just because I wasn't expecting it at that minute. (I had never seen it before)
As someone told me lately: "Ev'ryone deserves the chance to fly!"...
He's there, the Phantom of the Opera!...
I dreamed a dream in time gone bye...
This is the moment! My final test!...
PS. Couldn't choose just one :-)
Yeah. I saw it last March on BWay for the first time and had no clue what to expect. I just knew Phantom was like the really famous show. Even for a first timer and not expecting the chandalier to fall, i wasn't all that impressed. I like when the curtain disappears over it and the blankets on the rest of the things in the theater disappear and the overture is playing. I was more impressed with how the phantom is all over the top of the proscenium than i was with the chandlier. I was just, "crash already!". It just went too slow. You'd think now a days they could speed that thing up. I know they have the money for it!
well you'd think they could find a better way to do it. i like how they make it go up in the begining, but i dont like the end of ACT 1, just wasn't as amazing
At age 8, it scared the _______ out of me. For real, I would not walk up the stairs alone, I thought that someone my fall from the ceiling hanging from a rope.
At our community theatre, there is a looong roll of ROPE on the catwalk. It freaks me out EVERYTIME i go backstage!
Phantom is scary...or it scared me in Dallas back in the day on tour!
"Needless to say the crew is well acquainted with my ass and that's ok because they are the coolest guys ever."
- Idina Menzel
>>Be aware of folks who talk about PHANTOM as the "chandelier" show or something like that. It is usually a dead giveaway that in reality, they have never seen it.<<
Interesting. Has some kind of research and/or statistical study been done to prove the above theory? First I ever heard of it.
I saw POTO when it was in Denver six years ago, and I wasn't all that impressed by the chandelier drop. I dunno, maybe it's better in its permanent theater. Tour effects are never as good as the original counterparts (think CATS on tour. Ruined!).
Ive seen Phantom at 4 different locations, and although Broadway has the biggest chandelier, it is the slowest one to fall, vary graceful, more like a large victorian lady fainting, lol. London is a little better, but all the seats in London are closer to the stage so the chandelier is closer to the audience in the balconies. Toronto had the nicest "fall", it was quick and jerky which made it shake alot. the guy in the white shirt was a bit obvious.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/27199361@N08/ Phantom at the Royal Empire Theatre
It is almost comical on Broadway. The Vegas production was spectacular; really embraced the show's true nature and went all-out with the Chandelier. It was suspended at the beginning of the show, broken into pieces, and reassembled itself during the overture. The crash was moved toward the end, and it dropped directly downward into the orchestra seating with a blackout right before it "crashed." If I remember correctly.
I'm glad this thread has been revived. CATSNY revival's "amateurs" comment made me smile -- for those non-Phans on the board, it's Piangi's comment on the new managers at the beginning of POTO.
The new US tour chandelier is really cool, except that it's already up at the beginning of the show. While I liked the new tour, eliminating the chandelier's rise gets rid of one of the major goosebump moments in the show. On the other hand, the chandelier's fall is spectacular. (Ignore those rumors that it doesn't fall in the new version). I shrieked when it came down, just as I did at the Las Vegas production. I suspect that the main reason the Las Vegas production had the Phantom say, "Bring down the chandelier" was to warn people it was coming. BTW, the Las Vegas production placed the chandelier crash at the end, as in the 2004 movie -- there was no intermission to allow it to fall at the end of Act I.
Audrey, one of the insane "Phans" on the board
Audrey, the Phantom Phanatic, who nonetheless would rather be Jean Valjean, who knew how to make lemonade out of lemons.
The original Australia production in Melbourne had the Chandelier fall at a great speed
Well I didn't want to get into it, but he's a Satanist.
Every full moon he sacrifices 4 puppies to the Dark Lord and smears their blood on his paino.
This should help you understand the score for Wicked a little bit more.
Tazber's: Reply to
Is Stephen Schwartz a Practicing Christian