The Official Tony Nominations Thread — Page 16
#377
Posted: 5/16/07 at 9:52am
Ebersole has some tough competition - could divided votes pull the win another direction?
If anything, the votes between McDonald and Murphy will be divided and Ebersole will come out on top.
Same with Esparza - this wouldn't be the first time a young upstart (GrofF) got the Tony from the experienced forerunner (see last year, with LaChanze over LuPone.)
LaChanze was hardly a young upstart. She made her Broadway debut in 1986 and received her first Tony nomination 16 years ago. Groff made his Broadway debut last year.
If anything, the votes between McDonald and Murphy will be divided and Ebersole will come out on top.
Same with Esparza - this wouldn't be the first time a young upstart (GrofF) got the Tony from the experienced forerunner (see last year, with LaChanze over LuPone.)
LaChanze was hardly a young upstart. She made her Broadway debut in 1986 and received her first Tony nomination 16 years ago. Groff made his Broadway debut last year.
"Winning a Tony this year is like winning Best Attendance in third grade: no one will care but the winner and their mom."
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
-Kad
"I have also met him in person, and I find him to be quite funny actually. Arrogant and often misinformed, but still funny."
-bjh2114 (on Michael Riedel)
#378
Posted: 5/16/07 at 11:35am
If the voters want to spread the awards around to the key shows (which wouldn't be unheard of), then we're looking at SA, 110, Ebersole and Esparza winning
"She sang each word, the angels heard ... They closed her mouth and shipped her south. The woman's done."
#379
Posted: 5/16/07 at 12:47pm
Esparza winning is what we are there for this year - he definitely deserves it (yes, saw Pierce's performance, but not the others).
Ken
Ken
#380
Posted: 5/16/07 at 2:34pm
I'm not sure what's gonna happen with the leading actor category. I'm beginning to think it's at least a possibility that Cerveris will take some of Esparza's votes, and as a result, Pierce could sneak in.
"If there was a Mount Rushmore for Broadway scores, "West Side Story" would be front and center. It snaps, it crackles it pops! It surges with a roar, its energy and sheer life undiminished by the years" - NYPost reviewer Elisabeth Vincentelli
#381
Posted: 5/16/07 at 2:54pm
Same with Esparza - this wouldn't be the first time a young upstart (GrofF) got the Tony from the experienced forerunner (see last year, with LaChanze over LuPone.)
In addition to what WannaBe said, Groff won't win because he's pretty much filler in a category to make up for the lack of amazing lead male performances this season. LaChanze was a major contender for the Tony as her performance as Celie was widely praised. Jon Groff isn't even the best actor in Spring Awakening; everyone comes out of the show gushing about John Gallagher Jr's performance, not his.
In addition to what WannaBe said, Groff won't win because he's pretty much filler in a category to make up for the lack of amazing lead male performances this season. LaChanze was a major contender for the Tony as her performance as Celie was widely praised. Jon Groff isn't even the best actor in Spring Awakening; everyone comes out of the show gushing about John Gallagher Jr's performance, not his.
Like a firework unexploded
Wanting life but never knowing how
Wanting life but never knowing how
#382
Posted: 5/16/07 at 6:39pm
I'm disappointed but not surprised that O'Byrne got a Best Actor nomination. It must have been mainly for having to learn all those lines. If only O'Byrne had had a vague idea of what any of them meant...
I can't be too disturbed about PIRATE QUEEN's lack of a Best Costume Design nomination. If the category was MOST Costume Design, it would win in a walk, but if we're talking BEST, well, sorry.
But I'm really appalled at the sheer number of nominations for the idiotic CORAM BOY, most outrageously for Best Director. There was more intelligent direction in the final ten minutes of TRANSLATIONS than in the entire interminable running time of CORAM BOY. There's more to direction than setting up a turntable and creating a vast sheet of Saran Wrap.
I can't be too disturbed about PIRATE QUEEN's lack of a Best Costume Design nomination. If the category was MOST Costume Design, it would win in a walk, but if we're talking BEST, well, sorry.
But I'm really appalled at the sheer number of nominations for the idiotic CORAM BOY, most outrageously for Best Director. There was more intelligent direction in the final ten minutes of TRANSLATIONS than in the entire interminable running time of CORAM BOY. There's more to direction than setting up a turntable and creating a vast sheet of Saran Wrap.
"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers." Thomas Pynchon, GRAVITY'S RAINBOW
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." Philip K. Dick
My blog: http://www.roscoewrites.blogspot.com/
#383
Posted: 5/16/07 at 7:25pm
>> The set is provocative and used well.
WHAT set??? C'mon, this is just grasping. The "set", such as it was, is a joke. A college production would be more interesting.
And insofar as the "nuanced" lighting ("Ooo! Red for conservative! Blue for liberal! Purple!"), again, give me a break. I've seen more "nuanced" lighting at a rock concert.
The nomination is just laughable.
WHAT set??? C'mon, this is just grasping. The "set", such as it was, is a joke. A college production would be more interesting.
And insofar as the "nuanced" lighting ("Ooo! Red for conservative! Blue for liberal! Purple!"), again, give me a break. I've seen more "nuanced" lighting at a rock concert.
The nomination is just laughable.
http://docandraider.com
#384
Posted: 5/16/07 at 10:41pm
I thought Spring Awakening's lighting was one of the best parts of the show. It was very much a part of the storytelling. I was moved by it and immediately thought it was Tony worthy. As for the set, I don't believe it's the best of the season (High Fidelity, yeah!), but it serves its purpose. It's atypical, much like the rest of the show. What would you have rather seen?
~Steven
~Steven
#385
Posted: 5/17/07 at 3:35pm
BION, I'd have nominated LEGALLY BLONDE: the sets were witty, support the story beautifully, and -- from what I've seen in the trades -- are everything a Broadway musical should be.
I'll agree that the lighting is one of the best things about SA... but frankly that aint much to say.
I'll agree that the lighting is one of the best things about SA... but frankly that aint much to say.
http://docandraider.com
#386
Posted: 5/17/07 at 4:43pm
"BION, I'd have nominated LEGALLY BLONDE: the sets were witty, support the story beautifully, and -- from what I've seen in the trades -- are everything a Broadway musical should be."
The sets and lighting for LEGALLY BLONDE were nothing special. Exactly what you'd expect. In fact, other than the opening shot with all the windows of the Delta Nu dorm, the set was pretty forgettable. I dimly remember a judge's bench turning into a shower stall, which didn't work well at all. As far as lighting, SPRING AWAKENING has it all over LB. The lighting for LB was certainly not memorable (or award worthy).
IMHO, of course.
The sets and lighting for LEGALLY BLONDE were nothing special. Exactly what you'd expect. In fact, other than the opening shot with all the windows of the Delta Nu dorm, the set was pretty forgettable. I dimly remember a judge's bench turning into a shower stall, which didn't work well at all. As far as lighting, SPRING AWAKENING has it all over LB. The lighting for LB was certainly not memorable (or award worthy).
IMHO, of course.
Itty Bitty Geisha?
Toyland?
Gypsy Pasadoble?
Just a few popular favorites...
BroadwayWorld TV
Ticket Central