#101
Posted: 1/27/11 at 9:55pm
Jason,
I'm sorry that our exchanges never seem to end. What a bore this must be for the other readers of this thread. I'm sorry this thread has devolved into this.
I wish too that you would actually read what I write and not put words in my mouth. You say I denigrate Sondheim. Well, I didn't put him in my top 10 list. That does not equate to denigration. That would mean every person omitted from every top 10 list, including yours, would be similarly "denigrated." I said I did not care for much of his work. And I don't. That's not denigration. I actually
do like some of his work. I feel that other composers' works far surpass his.That's no more denigration than PJ's statement that Sondheim surpasses
everyone else represents a denigration of everyone else.
I never said, nor do I feel, that those who think Sondheim the greatest
composer ever are crazy, stupid, or out of their minds. If that's what they feel, fine. My objection, as I've stated like 1,632 times, and please, why can't you listen or understand this, is to those who try to force people into agreeing with this opinion through intimidation, ridicule, or snobism.
I never said that Paul was "out of his mind" for putting Sondheim at the
top of his list. I felt he was being offensive with his comment, and I wasn't going to go on reading what he had to say. And I didn't. I'm glad you found it worthwhile, though.
Now, since you keep insisting that I "explain" myself, and not wishing to stir up another hornets' nest, I'll simply say that his work is too.... "sulphurous,"
and leave it at that. I hope that will suffice for you, but, somehow I expect it will not.
In any case, Jason, we've now hurled brickbats at one another for quite a while. Despite your having flunked me, I think nonetheless that you're a good egg, and probably a great teacher.
So I'd like to end this as friends, and allow this thread to go back to what it was intended to be.
I'm sorry that our exchanges never seem to end. What a bore this must be for the other readers of this thread. I'm sorry this thread has devolved into this.
I wish too that you would actually read what I write and not put words in my mouth. You say I denigrate Sondheim. Well, I didn't put him in my top 10 list. That does not equate to denigration. That would mean every person omitted from every top 10 list, including yours, would be similarly "denigrated." I said I did not care for much of his work. And I don't. That's not denigration. I actually
do like some of his work. I feel that other composers' works far surpass his.That's no more denigration than PJ's statement that Sondheim surpasses
everyone else represents a denigration of everyone else.
I never said, nor do I feel, that those who think Sondheim the greatest
composer ever are crazy, stupid, or out of their minds. If that's what they feel, fine. My objection, as I've stated like 1,632 times, and please, why can't you listen or understand this, is to those who try to force people into agreeing with this opinion through intimidation, ridicule, or snobism.
I never said that Paul was "out of his mind" for putting Sondheim at the
top of his list. I felt he was being offensive with his comment, and I wasn't going to go on reading what he had to say. And I didn't. I'm glad you found it worthwhile, though.
Now, since you keep insisting that I "explain" myself, and not wishing to stir up another hornets' nest, I'll simply say that his work is too.... "sulphurous,"
and leave it at that. I hope that will suffice for you, but, somehow I expect it will not.
In any case, Jason, we've now hurled brickbats at one another for quite a while. Despite your having flunked me, I think nonetheless that you're a good egg, and probably a great teacher.
So I'd like to end this as friends, and allow this thread to go back to what it was intended to be.