WOMEN ON THE VERGE OF A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN begins previews TONIGHT! — Page 17
Posted: 10/12/10 at 7:48am
New shows always bring new posters, and most of the new characters here seem like they'll fit right in. Kyle is a little annoying, but I wouldn't put him on the level of a CountA.
That other one donthatewhatever is a total douche bag however. Here's some free advice from a long time poster who has seen tons of similarly obnoxious posters come and go:
once you admit to being a shill, the more disagreeable you are, the more you're being counter productive in encouraging support for your show.
As far as the actual show goes, I'm still really excited to see it. I rarely base my decisions on what to see from BWW member reviews. I appreciate them as opinions, but don't put a lot of stock in them. And I would include my own reviews in that same category and wouldn't advise anyone to take what I say as gospel. It is always just my
opinion
Updated On: 10/12/10 at 07:48 AM
Posted: 10/12/10 at 7:50am
The only sign of trouble outside the theater was when a man collecting change in a cup said, "I hope today is better. I heard yesterday was bad, real bad."
Namo FTW.
Posted: 10/12/10 at 8:40am
Posted: 10/12/10 at 10:06am
As for my post being long, I agree, the last thing this place needs is detailed analysis and thought supporting one's position.
And dontwhatever, I know you were "paying me a compliment" but what you were trying to do was join with me and I think you're a nozzle so I declined.
ETA Kyle, it was people who posted their enthusiasm for Wicked in San Francisco and who went on and on about what a great show it was going to be and how it was not to be missed that I bought two full price tickets for two nights after it opened on Broadway. It is because of people with that opinion that I wasted my money. I had my doubts about Schwartz going in, but since I admired the flawed but clever source material and the two leads, how bad could it be. I thought it was awful, just awful.
What I think about Women on the Verge is that people who have tickets later on should not be worried by what they read here. I find it much more likely that Women will get tighter and smoother like the face of many actresses of a certain age as time goes on. Unlike Wicked, which San Francisco fans assure me somehow got worse and worse with changes that happened between SF and NYC.
If Wicked's more to your liking than Women on the Verge, that's a matter of taste. For people who are open to stories about grown up women as opposed to grown up women playing college girls as tweens, then I say they shouldn't panic if they're ticket holders to this show.
Updated On: 10/12/10 at 10:06 AM
Posted: 10/12/10 at 11:30am
Posted: 10/12/10 at 11:35am
Posted: 10/12/10 at 11:38am
Posted: 10/12/10 at 11:57am
Posted: 10/12/10 at 11:58am
Posted: 10/12/10 at 12:22pm
But David Yazbek has never impressed me as being anything more than an enthusiastic garage band member, and Lane's book for Scoundrels was hack work, much in line with his hack work writing for a few weekly tv shows long, long ago - I don't see either possessing the art, craft, or skill required to turn an interesting and eccentric little movie into a first-rate new piece of musical theatre, in command of the possibilities the theatre has to offer. And, although it sounds like he has nothing to do here, Gatelli's work has never even registered in the five shows I've seen featuring his stuff.
So, because of my lack of faith in the writers, I anticipate giving this one a miss. But I guess I still have a bit of interest in hearing some detailed opinions (rather than just "I love it!" or "I hate it!").
Posted: 10/12/10 at 1:01pm
Posted: 10/12/10 at 1:19pm
Interesting that the weekend grosses showed an average ticket price of $61.66 (must have been a lot of LCT members) and a percent capacity of 91%, even though people were told that the show was sold out over the weekend (and tickets were not available on Telecharge, either). Maybe they were holding some seats, but a 10% discrepancy is pretty big. I wonder if the listed potential capacity is accurate. Is the show configured to reduce the seating capacity, or does the renovated Belasco have fewer seats than the old Belasco?
Updated On: 10/12/10 at 01:19 PM
Posted: 10/12/10 at 1:43pm
Posted: 10/12/10 at 2:00pm
Rose: "Of Course I know, I Watch Fox News"
-(modified)Gypsy
Broadway Schedule
December 5th- Hamilton, On Your Feet
December 19th- Noises Off, Edith Piaf Concert at Town Hall
Posted: 10/12/10 at 2:28pm
Anyway, looking forward to more opinions on this show as folks get out to see it.
Posted: 10/12/10 at 2:49pm
Posted: 10/12/10 at 2:50pm
Count A well may be TooDarnHot, Eos. He's been Chanticleer and a few others.
Bundy, the stage door is essentially the big black gates to the left of the lobby.
Mimi, why be nervous about seeing a show? Many people have liked it, and think it just needs the kinks ironed out. Just enjoy yourself, and form your own opinion.
Updated On: 10/12/10 at 02:50 PM
Posted: 10/12/10 at 2:59pm
Posted: 10/12/10 at 3:15pm
Posted: 10/12/10 at 3:49pm
Posted: 10/12/10 at 4:00pm
Posted: 10/12/10 at 4:03pm
Posted: 10/12/10 at 4:19pm
Oh and stage-door wise, every one comes out, Pattie was so gracious and signed for everyone but kindly said no to pics as she was headed to a wedding reception as she had already missed the ceremony. Sherie Renee Scott was the only one not to sign, although I was expecting that. She walked out with a medium sized pot of flowers..must have been given to the cast and quietly walked out, making it clear she couldn't sign b/c of the flowers..I feel like maybe she will bring those everyday to avoid signing?
Posted: 10/12/10 at 4:22pm
BroadwayWorld TV