On a positive and optimistic note, what roles do you thinnk
Andrea would be great for?
Right now, Mamma Mia is #1. There is no reason, at least from her performances, talent, and looks, that she shouldn't be playing Donna now and for years to come in various companies (but especially on Broadway). Unless, as MB says, something else is going down.
I agree about the defensiveness. It seems to be choking her in that interview. I haven't heard any horror stories about her being difficult to work with. Even if she's aloof or chooses her friends and allies carefully, who the hell cares? And what does that have to do with casting her? If her acting chops aren't up to it, that's another. But despite people loving to jump on that wagon, I haven't seen any clips of her where I thought her acting was bad ... or even any worse than many of the diva actresses that regularly land Broadway gigs.
I also agree that she needs new management. They aren't doing her any favors, and she should be working a lot more with her experience, talent, and "legendary" status. There are very few Broadway names that are instantly recognizable on a marquee. She has one of them. If her management team can't rise to the occasion get her better gigs, she needs to fire them and get another. Maybe it's a "trust factor" with her and it's hard for her to see how clearly mediocre they've been. I'll bet there are plenty out there who would love to represent her.
EDIT: Other roles ...
Margaret White in Carrie
Phyllis in Follies (in a couple of years)
And if she ever decides to eat a sandwich (let's face it, the girl is a bit gaunt right now---looks like a few too many hours in spinning classes each day) ...
Mame
Dolly
Mother in Ragtime
There was a thread a year or so ago about Andrea, and in that thread it mentioned she had auditioned for the role of Donna in Mamma Mia. She's the only person who would get me to go and see that show.
The last time I saw her on stage was when Beauty and the Beast was still at the Palace. I thought she was wonderful. I have always loved her voice. Correction, I last saw her in Annie Get Your Gun a few years ago in Philadelphia.
Isn't her husband her manager?
"Isn't her husband her manager?"
LOL Well, then, I guess she DID fire him all around, based on that interview.
Here's to the future, Andrea! Your many fans are waiting for you.
EDIT: And it's interesting when she talks about her "newly single status," she doesn't sound bitter. I should make it clear that while she sounds defensive in that interview, she doesn't come of as sour or resentful. She seems to be focusing on positive things and the future, which is a healthy attitude. If she can lose at least the "illusion" of the protective shell of armor, it will work greatly in her favor. Not that she (or anyone else) doesn't need a protective shell in show business ... just don't wear it so openly that it chokes your interviews.
The fact is no other Annie has ever come close to this. This is perfection.
"Annie": Live Audio from the final preview before opening (Press night)1977!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhI0F6gKPhk&feature=player_detailpage
I have to reread that interview as I don't recall seeing "newly single status"!
I could have sworn someone in the other thread mentioned that negotiations broke down for Mamma Mia.
As far as the newly single status, she talks about it for a section, it's not just mentioned quickly in passing (and it's the video interview I'm referring to, not anything to "re-read."). She tells him "she had a good run," referring to her recently ended marriage. She and her daughter are living in NY now.
Having also worked with Andrea, I found her nothing but professional, tough and pleasant to be around, (unlike LuPone, who most crews and many actors can't stand to be around).
Her talent is unique, I find her voice to be a national treasure, but she's never been a typical ingenue or a typical anything, and now she's reached an age where suitable roles could be scarce. But she keeps working in various venues and hopefully a new role will match her special talents on Broadway again.
As far as being "gaunt", you should feel her bicep, gurl is toned!
OK, just finished watching the interview. Wow! In deference to Julie Stevens and Life After Tomorrow, it was a documentary. I watched that when it first came out, and no where did I see it as Julie telling anyone's story. From what I remember, the individuals who participated told their own stories. I also thought Julie eventually was a part of the Broadway production. I thought Andrea was a bit harsh calling all those girls, "wannabees".
I would love to see Andrea as Reno Sweeney.
not sure how my "pursuing" became "perusing"...i didn't edit it. But anyhoo the specific role i mean is Sally since she did it on B'way. Yes, she sings the hell out of the numbers, but...c'mon.
Many of the roles mentioned would be good on her. i saw her do Mama Rose live and the acting was just fine (eventually, it was a fast rehearsal period and she took a while to settle in with perfs). And of course the singing was terrific. That is what made me think a new Merman show for her, where she's NOT being compared to other originators, might make sense.
i agree that i admire her doing regional work. i wish more NYC names would do the same!
it's a shame about MIA and i have heard that same story of the twelve callbacks, in fact i think it's the same woman if she's currently touring in one of those city shows....not sure what's going on in MIA producer's heads. There is a McArdle contigent in NYC for sure that would return to the show to see her, and the regular tourists would love the energy of her voice in that three-power-ballad succession in Act Two. The best person i've seen do that so far (not that i go to the show a lot) is Dee Hoty.
not sure how my "pursuing" became "perusing"...i didn't edit it. But anyhoo the specific role i mean is Sally since she did it on B'way. Yes, she sings the hell out of the numbers, but...c'mon.
Many of the roles mentioned would be good on her. i saw her do Mama Rose live and the acting was just fine (eventually, it was a fast rehearsal period and she took a while to settle in with perfs). And of course the singing was terrific. That is what made me think a new Merman show for her, where she's NOT being compared to other originators, might make sense.
i agree that i admire her doing regional work. i wish more NYC names would do the same!
it's a shame about MIA and i have heard that same story of the twelve callbacks, in fact i think it's the same woman if she's currently touring in one of those city shows....not sure what's going on in MIA producer's heads. There is a McArdle contigent in NYC for sure that would return to the show to see her, and the regular tourists would love the energy of her voice in that three-power-ballad succession in Act Two. The best person i've seen do that so far (not that i go to the show a lot) is Dee Hoty.
I think the comparision to Mermam is obvious. To my ear, and I would like to hear other opinions, they are the only 2 singers (well, famous singers) who seem to have no head voice. They can produce a lighter sound but it still seems to come from their chests.
Andrea justs keep belting and belting like no other, it gives me chills, in a very good way.
The term "wanna-be" may seem harsh on the surface but when you hav girls running around who say they were in ANNIE on Broadway if they were not, that's exactly what they are.
Broadway Legend Joined: 3/15/07
I think her attitude towards the girls/producers of the documentary is fear. In my opinion, she was afraid of being shown in a poor light or edited in a poor light. For example she may say "I was always tired, but boy I was having a blast!" and they'd only show "I was always tired."
I agree something has to be up since she's not being cast in anything on Broadway. Maybe she's just an odd type. Too old to play younger leads, but still has a youthful sounding voice.
Also, she says she can tap in the video. Has anyone seen her dance? COULD she handle the current "Anything Goes" choreography? That would be a great role for her.
As far as a "dust-up" is concerened, (I'm not sure what that means, the only time I use it is when the houseboy arrives and I say go dust-up in the bedroom, and even that has several meanings) I doubt those comments are why she is not currently performing on Broadway, management and as stated her perculiar talents are more likely the reason.
perhaps the "dust-up" that OP thought might be in the offing can be joined by Elizabitch H and Bill Maher from the Off-Topic board (by the by, why is this article and the one on the NY Times article on a Garland impersonator not on THAT board instead of the Broadway one?)....which one could play Pepper better?
I finally watched the interview in full and there clearly is some bitterment and resentment regarding the documentary and its participants, but to me, it seemed there was a lot of backstory that wasn't being said (and probably shouldn't). Yeah, she stuck her foot in her mouth with some comments and she probably doesn't edit herself much. I would have just left it with "I was approached for the project, but it wasn't right for me" and avoided any other mention. Regardless, I don't think the comments are cause for litigation, especially at this point, where the documentary aired years ago and the DVD release has been around a long time. If anything, it might give a tiny boost in sales from the few who might have watched the interview yet haven't seen the film and are curious.
"Having also worked with Andrea, I found her nothing but professional, tough and pleasant to be around, (unlike LuPone, who most crews and many actors can't stand to be around)."
I have worked with both, and the crews liked Patti just as much as they liked Andrea.
Neither actress suffer fools lightly.
And I would love to see her do NEXT TO NORMAL.
Interesting thread and interview. My two cents: Andrea McArdle should consider herself EXTREMELY lucky. Not only did she create one of the most iconic roles in theater history (albeit as a child, with the child star baggage that goes with it), she went on to STAR in FOUR additional BROADWAY SHOWS in her adult life. I mean, I know it's been over a decade since her last Broadway role, but come on. She has achieved a hundred times more than most actors ever do, and even if she's doing all regional theater now, at least she's working.
She comes across as undeservedly bitter and mean in this interview. I'm sorry. She is not entitled to anything and needs to drop the attitude.
I really dont sense ANY bitterness or bad attitude. She is very "matter of fact" and speaks from experience. I've seen the documentary and it did seem like a whine fest and if she felt like it was gonna come at the experience from a bad angle then good for her for not taking part in it.
And she said herself that she likes doing regional, so I don't see where people are getting her "she is whining about not working" attitude from.
I don't fault her for THINKING those things, I fault her for saying them in an interview.
So, you fault her for having an opinion on her life?
No he doesn't. As he said it's not about what she believes or the opinions she has but publicly expressing them that was the problem.
She did come across as quite bitter and unhappy with her career to me. To me it came across that she wants to be a "Broadway star" badly and was almost pleading for someone give her a vehicle to do so. I don't know, I guess you could argue that it isn't necessarily bad for her to do it. I just found it, while interesting, a little bit awkward.
She was asked a question in an interview and she gave her answer. It's not like she just came out with a statement on her own.
I was always taught that anyone can say whatever they want. How you react to it is no ones choice but your own.
To clarify, I totally understand how she feels. If I were in her shoes I might feel the same way. But the way she expressed herself in this public forum kind of rubbed me the wrong way. She could have communicated her disapproval of the documentary and her frustrations with her career in a more graceful way, that's all.
Broadway Legend Joined: 7/20/03
I saw her last December in Annie - on paper a really fun idea - playing Miss Hannigan. Not fun. Just no humor at all, all show and tell acting and it was a little painful to watch, as I'm a fan. I'm told she was very nice to work with and very sweet to all.
I have seen two other Annies who I thought not only came up to her level, but, for me, may have surpassed - Louanne in one of the many national tours (with the wonderful Ruth Kobart, who, outside of my beloved Dorothy, was the best Miss Hannigan I've seen), and, in the production last December (where McArdle played Hannigan) Melody Hollis, who was fantastic, and with whom I've been working for the last nine months - great voice, and, most importantly, REAL.
Videos