The concept goes all the way back to ancient Greece, when theatrical structure was more clearly defined. The hero or anti-hero is usually the protagonist (aka, main character).
But I don't believe there has to be a hero in a given story. Certainly not in our modern musical theatre. There doesn't necessarily have to be a single protagonist either (if it has a balanced "ensemble piece" storyline).
The musical "Sweeney Todd" has no heroes, unless you count the peripheral characters of Anthony and Johanna. And they are faintly heroic at best. Sweeney himself is the anti-hero as well as the protagonist of the story, but he's not the villain by any means. Look to Judge Turpin and the Beadle for that.
And, yes, anti-heroes can just as easily be female. How about Roxie Hart?
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Finch, Childcatcher, Sweeney Todd, Billy Flynn, Captain Hook
"It's a great feeling of power to be naked in front of people. We're happy to watch actual incredible graphic violence and gore, but as soon as somebody's naked it seems like the public goes a bit bananas about the whole thing."
Finch, Sweeney & Billy Flynn are principle characters who are not heroic in nature. I would call them anti-heroes for sure.
But the Childcatcher and Captain Hook are actually villains. Not the main character or focal point of their stories, and they serve as enemies of the "hero."
"Jaws is the Citizen Kane of movies."
blocked: logan2, Diamonds3, Hamilton22
Okay, the dictionary definition of an antihero characterized by a lack of traditional heroic qualities, such as idealism or courage."
An antihero is NOT the villain of a piece. Basically, they're a main character that acts in a manner not befitting a hero but whose side the audience is on anyway. There doesn't need to be a hero to foil an antihero, because they're often the protagonist. I would argue that Javert isn't an antihero and is instead simply a very layered, complex antagonist. Despite the fact that he is a very well-drawn character that is designed for the audience to pity, the audience is not on his side--they're on Valjean's. There's a difference between villains and antiheros, even though it can be blurry.
His gentle companion: Ha! If they only knew.
-Chess ************************* I've seen plays that were more exciting than this. Honest to God... PLAYS. -Homer at the zoo.
"I would argue that Javert isn't an antihero and is instead simply a very layered, complex antagonist. Despite the fact that he is a very well-drawn character that is designed for the audience to pity, the audience is not on his side--they're on Valjean's. There's a difference between villains and antiheros, even though it can be blurry."
But as a sympathetic antagonist, doesn't that make Javert an anti-hero in the same way an unsympathetic progtagonist is an anti-hero?
"But as a sympathetic antagonist, doesn't that make Javert an anti-hero in the same way an unsympathetic progtagonist is an anti-hero?"
No, I'm not buying that every antagonist we feel sorry for is an antihero. Would you say that a character like Sweeney is unsympathetic? The whole point is that the audience knows the character is acting in a manner not befitting a hero, but still feels for them and is on their side anyway.
The whole idea of an antihero is that they take up the space in a show or literary work that is usually occupied by the hero. Villains are villains. A sympathetic antagonist is a good character, not an antihero just because he's sympathetic. I think the term "antihero" is a bit more discerning than that.
Best12...ahh yes I can see what you mean. I always thought of Captain Hook though as anti-hero but not villianous..I'm not sure why. I mean, true he kidnaps children and tries to kill Tinkerbell and Peter Pan...and Wendy..and Michael..and John....
Wooo nevermind.
How about the Artful Dodger?
"It's a great feeling of power to be naked in front of people. We're happy to watch actual incredible graphic violence and gore, but as soon as somebody's naked it seems like the public goes a bit bananas about the whole thing."
Miss Andrew- Mary Poppins Count Fosco- The Woman in White Javert- Les Miserables George- Sunday in the Park with George Blanche Ingram- Jane Eyre (No, haven't seen the show, just have the CD.) Franca- Light in the Piazza (Well, remember "The Joy you Feel" and what she did with Fabrizio?) That's all I can think of.
---------------------------------------------------------------- Family. It's all you really have. -Sunday in the Park with George
MARGARET: "Clara, stop that. That's illegal." - The Light in the Piazza
"I'm not in Bambi and I'm not blonde!" - Idina Menzel
Good point, Taryn. I still wouldn't classify Javert as a villian. Villians are completely unsympathetic. I certainly believe him to be the antagonist, therefore, him being anti-hero really doesn't make sense. An anti-villian perhaps? Seeing that the audience knows he's not acting in a mannar befitting villians, but roots against him anyway.
Or something.
You know, I have no idea what I'm talking about, so I'm just gonna shut up. LOL
Thenardier. Now there's a villianous couple for you.
"It's a great feeling of power to be naked in front of people. We're happy to watch actual incredible graphic violence and gore, but as soon as somebody's naked it seems like the public goes a bit bananas about the whole thing."
I really love most that are listed before, but i have to add specifically the Baroness in Chitty... it may just be because Jan Maxwell is amazing but I simply love this character!
Not my favorites, but out of curiosity, would Jekyll/Hyde be considered as one entity as the anti-hero or as two entities and therefore the hero and villain?
"Wilkins, after all these years, are you trying to be funny?"
I've never seen Jekyl & Hyde, but, based on the book, I would consider them one person and call him a tragic hero, not an anti-hero. He was fighting against himself and lost . . . I mean Dr. Jekyl lost . . . right? . . . oh boy, time to read the book again, lol).