ultimately, the problem with eating meat is an ethical one. we are basically breeding intelligent creatures to kill them and consume them. if you wouldn't eat your dog, why is okay to eat a cow or a pig?
but there is a larger economical one that presses now, too. with 1 acre of land, you can feed only two people with meat. you can feed 20 with grain.
some of you are reading about the superbugs for which there are no antibiotics. a large portion of this problem stems from antibiotics being put into animal feed. this breeds resistance in their flora, and then gives it to you when you consume it. then there is a huge amount of animal fecal material that is being drained into the water supply from mass farming. between all of this, meat eating simply is not sustainable. many of you have probably heard how we are overfishing the oceans, as well. within a few decades, all that we may be able to get from the oceans are jellyfish. mmmmm.
but we can also admit that, at this time, the technology to totally replace meat is not yet there. perhaps in 50-100 years or so. in the meantime, each person can do their part. try to minimize the amount of meat you eat; we are all probably eating way too much meat anyway. try to eat organic to protest the use of antibiotics in animal feed. this is also why people have to be reasonable about it; as demonstrated by an earlier thread, eating organic is expensive, and if it's not in the budget, people should be understanding. if there is something that is being overfished/overharvested, don't eat it.
lastly, people on this board in particular, should avoid using the "natural" argument. the first fallacy of the "natural" argument is that it assumes that "natural" = "right." earthquakes, smallpox, and HIV are also "natural," but we don't need more of those.
oh, and if you have a scorpion or spider problem, chickens are a very green solution.
Updated On: 1/4/14 at 07:10 PM